User talk:Aura: Difference between revisions

Line 83:

: Would be great, but I'm not sure how to do that... I mean, it's already a little less than one cent per pixel as is in terms of its overall size- it wouldn't be feasible to add markers for all 1200 cents... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

:: I think 50-cent steps would absolutely suffice, maybe even 100-cent steps. It's for the reason that you don't have to look up intervals or calculate from ratio. And furthermore you can see at a glance that it is a logarithmic diagram. This scale could as well have bigger and smaller ticks and maybe only some numbers like 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200 (if numbers at all). I'm currently not able to decide what would look best... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 05:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:12, 22 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:00, 22 September 2020 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Feature request to Diatonic Function Map: re Newer edit →
Line 83:		Line 83:

	: Would be great, but I'm not sure how to do that... I mean, it's already a little less than one cent per pixel as is in terms of its overall size- it wouldn't be feasible to add markers for all 1200 cents... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 02:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)		: Would be great, but I'm not sure how to do that... I mean, it's already a little less than one cent per pixel as is in terms of its overall size- it wouldn't be feasible to add markers for all 1200 cents... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 02:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

			:: I think 50-cent steps would absolutely suffice, maybe even 100-cent steps. It's for the reason that you don't have to look up intervals or calculate from ratio. And furthermore you can see at a glance that it is a logarithmic diagram. This scale could as well have bigger and smaller ticks and maybe only some numbers like 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200 (if numbers at all). I'm currently not able to decide what would look best... --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 05:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)