33/32: Difference between revisions
m cat. as medium comma |
Capitalization of one word |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''33/32''', the ''' | '''33/32''', the '''Al-Farabi quarter tone'''<ref>The name goes back to Abu Nasr Al-Farabi (in Western reception also Alpharabius), see [[wikipedia:Al-Farabi]] </ref>, '''undecimal quarter tone''', or '''undecimal comma''', is a [[superparticular]] [[ratio]] which differs by a [[385/384|keenanisma (385/384)]], from the [[36/35|septimal quarter tone (36/35)]]. Raising a just [[4/3|perfect fourth (4/3)]] by the al-Farabi quarter-tone leads to the [[11/8|undecimal super-fourth (11/8)]]. Raising it instead by 36/35 leads to the [[48/35|septimal super-fourth (48/35)]] which approximates 11/8. | ||
Because of its close proximity to [[28/27]], form which it differs only by [[Pentacircle comma|896/891]], one could reasonably argue that 33/32 is the undecimal counterpart to 28/27 in a way, particularly if treated as an interval in its own right. However, despite this, 33/32 generally has properties more akin to a chromatic interval than to anything resembling a diatonic interval. In addition, 33/32 could arguably have been used as a melodic interval in the Greek Enharmonic Genus, and if so, there are several possibilities for the resulting tetrachord. The most obvious of these possibilities would be to include 32:33:34 within the interval of a perfect fourth, in which case this ancient Greek scale can be approximated in [[22edo]] and [[24edo]], with the comma 1089/1088 being tempered out so that 33/32 and 34/33 are equated. Another possibility, however, is that the semitone was [[16/15]], which, according to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genus_(music) Wikipedia], is indirectly attested to in the writings of Ptolemy, and thus, if 33/32 was in fact used, it would have been paired with [[512/495]]. | Because of its close proximity to [[28/27]], form which it differs only by [[Pentacircle comma|896/891]], one could reasonably argue that 33/32 is the undecimal counterpart to 28/27 in a way, particularly if treated as an interval in its own right. However, despite this, 33/32 generally has properties more akin to a chromatic interval than to anything resembling a diatonic interval. In addition, 33/32 could arguably have been used as a melodic interval in the Greek Enharmonic Genus, and if so, there are several possibilities for the resulting tetrachord. The most obvious of these possibilities would be to include 32:33:34 within the interval of a perfect fourth, in which case this ancient Greek scale can be approximated in [[22edo]] and [[24edo]], with the comma 1089/1088 being tempered out so that 33/32 and 34/33 are equated. Another possibility, however, is that the semitone was [[16/15]], which, according to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genus_(music) Wikipedia], is indirectly attested to in the writings of Ptolemy, and thus, if 33/32 was in fact used, it would have been paired with [[512/495]]. | ||