CritDeathX
Joined 9 February 2020
CritDeathX (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 221: | Line 221: | ||
::::::::: Well, then 6/5 should be saved since 6-5=1 (1/5) and 6+5=11 (11/5). I would suggest that a utonal interval's tonality will be opposite of the otonal version's tonality, though there's a couple exceptions to that rule as well. --[[User:CritDeathX|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX|talk]]) 19:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC) | ::::::::: Well, then 6/5 should be saved since 6-5=1 (1/5) and 6+5=11 (11/5). I would suggest that a utonal interval's tonality will be opposite of the otonal version's tonality, though there's a couple exceptions to that rule as well. --[[User:CritDeathX|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX|talk]]) 19:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::: I should point out that if the numerator is "1", that doesn't count as a power of 2 for this rule due to the fact that ''anything'' to the 0 power is 1. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:17, 12 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::: Okay, I just found a major problem- 7/6 and 12/7 are both disconnected intervals, leading to a lack of potential above the Tonic. However, their results are as follows: | |||
:::::::::: 7/6 - 7-6 = 1 (1/6), 7+6 = 13 (13/6) | |||
:::::::::: 12/7 - 12-7 = 5 (12/5), 12+7 = 19 (19/7) | |||
:::::::::: As for what you're saying... The reason I say that otonal intervals and utonal intervals ultimately have the same type of tonality has everything to do with the fact that the overtone series and the undertone series are mirror images of one another. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:32, 12 September 2020 (UTC) | |||