CritDeathX
Joined 9 February 2020
No edit summary |
CritDeathX (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
: Hope that helps! --[[User:CritDeathX|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX|talk]]) 15:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC) | : Hope that helps! --[[User:CritDeathX|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX|talk]]) 15:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: For the record, I'm a male- which means I'm a "he". Anyhow, I'm glad you find the idea of prime-limit categories promising. Still, I have to admit that I find the 23-limit, 29-limit, and 31-limit very hard to use. I know that the paradiatonic primes can give rise to "parachromatic" intervals such as 55/54... Oh! What about renaming the "quasiparadiatonic" primes the "pseudodiatonic" primes? After all, these primes are not diatonic by any stretch, but they still seem to be good substitutes for the paradiatonic primes in a pinch... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC) | :: For the record, I'm a male- which means I'm a "he". Anyhow, I'm glad you find the idea of prime-limit categories promising. Still, I have to admit that I find the 23-limit, 29-limit, and 31-limit very hard to use. I know that the paradiatonic primes can give rise to "parachromatic" intervals such as 55/54... Oh! What about renaming the "quasiparadiatonic" primes the "pseudodiatonic" primes? After all, these primes are not diatonic by any stretch, but they still seem to be good substitutes for the paradiatonic primes in a pinch... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
::: That sounds like a good idea! It helps with not having to say a mouthful, I'll say that much. --[[User:CritDeathX|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX|talk]]) 16:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC) | |||