2.3.5.7.11.13.19.29 subgroup: Difference between revisions

Discard 41j & 53 (too complex to be practical)
Overthink (talk | contribs)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
[[Hemififths]], through the 41 & 58h extension, provides a fairly simple but efficient way to approach the subgroup through a dicot structure, finding ~19/16 and ~29/16 to be a pythagorean comma above ~7/6 and ~16/9 respectively, 29/16 here is approximated to within a cent of accuracy.
[[Hemififths]], through the 41 & 58h extension, provides a fairly simple but efficient way to approach the subgroup through a dicot structure, finding ~19/16 and ~29/16 to be a pythagorean comma above ~7/6 and ~16/9 respectively, 29/16 here is approximated to within a cent of accuracy.


[[Newt]] is arguably the most efficient rank-2 microtemperament of the subgroup despite its apparent great complexity, and much like hemififths, has a dicot structure. It has a strong extension for ~29/16. though its mapping is proportionally less accurate than the rest, being a cent off instead of tenths of a cent off.
[[Newt]] is arguably the most efficient rank-2 microtemperament of the subgroup despite its apparent great complexity, and much like hemififths, has a dicot structure. It has a strong extension for ~29/16, though its mapping is proportionally less accurate than the rest, being a cent off instead of tenths of a cent off.


[[Cassandra]] provides a chain-of-fifths framework for approaching the subgroup, and has a very strong extension for 19/16 as a minor third, but has two plausible extensions for ~29/16:  
[[Cassandra]] provides a chain-of-fifths framework for approaching the subgroup, and has a very strong extension for 19/16 as a minor third, but has two plausible extensions for ~29/16: