Temperament naming: Difference between revisions
Update to codify the other common patterns |
Re-organize |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Below are explained some notable features of naming which might otherwise be confusing to beginners of RTT. | Below are explained some notable features of naming which might otherwise be confusing to beginners of RTT. | ||
==== Use of a name for a temperament and its extensions ==== | ==== Use of a name for a temperament and its extensions ==== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 12: | ||
* If a temperament does not have an obvious extension, or has multiple competing extensions, none of them is canonical; | * If a temperament does not have an obvious extension, or has multiple competing extensions, none of them is canonical; | ||
* [[Weak extension]]s are never canonical since their structures are very different. | * [[Weak extension]]s are never canonical since their structures are very different. | ||
==== Use of a related pair of names for a comma and its associated temperament ==== | |||
With a few exceptions, a name of a comma implies an eponymous temperament that tempers out the comma alone and vice versa, in which case we consider it an official common name. A description, or descriptive name, is an alternative, typically longer, term that conveys some additional information at the cost of lacking in uniqueness. For example, 225/224 is named the ''marvel comma'', and tempering it out results in the marvel temperament. Meanwhile, it has a descriptive name ''septimal kleisma'' that perhaps dates back to earlier times. | |||
==== Use of a related pair of names for prime-limit and subgroup temperaments ==== | ==== Use of a related pair of names for prime-limit and subgroup temperaments ==== | ||