User talk:Hkm: Difference between revisions
→89edo-92edo tempering out the quartisma: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
In my opinion, Aura does seem to have some bias towards its notability, likely since 33/32 is an important interval in [[Alpharabian tuning]]. Nonetheless, if you removed it from the 89edo and 90edo pages, it would be best to remove it from the 91edo and 92edo pages as well. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 17:08, 20 March 2026 (UTC) | In my opinion, Aura does seem to have some bias towards its notability, likely since 33/32 is an important interval in [[Alpharabian tuning]]. Nonetheless, if you removed it from the 89edo and 90edo pages, it would be best to remove it from the 91edo and 92edo pages as well. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 17:08, 20 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
== Deleting temperaments == | |||
Plz remember to check the links to them. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 19:08, 22 July 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:09, 22 July 2026
I don't like this being a red link so I'm just putting some unimportant text here
89edo-92edo tempering out the quartisma
Originally, the 89edo, 90edo, 91edo, and 92edo articles all mentioned being in a series of four consecutive edos tempering out the quartisma. I see you've removed it from 90edo recently, and 89edo a while back. When I checked the history, I found that this information was added to these pages by Aura back in September of 2020.
In my opinion, Aura does seem to have some bias towards its notability, likely since 33/32 is an important interval in Alpharabian tuning. Nonetheless, if you removed it from the 89edo and 90edo pages, it would be best to remove it from the 91edo and 92edo pages as well. --Overthink (talk) 17:08, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
Deleting temperaments
Plz remember to check the links to them. —FloraC (talk) 19:08, 22 July 2026 (UTC)