Survey of efficient temperaments by subgroup: Difference between revisions
→Table of temperaments (5 to 45 notes per equave): correct misty's complexity |
→Table of temperaments (5 to 45 notes per equave): Break into 2 tables to try to address others' complaints about messiness |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
== Table of temperaments (5 to 45 notes per equave) == | == Table of temperaments (5 to 45 notes per equave) == | ||
The temperaments within each cell should be sorted by accuracy, with the lowest [[damage]] (highest accuracy) temperament listed first. | The temperaments within each cell should be sorted by accuracy, with the lowest [[damage]] (highest accuracy) temperament listed first. | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
If you see any temperaments listed in the wrong order, or see any temperaments in the wrong "approx. number of notes needed" category, please move them to the correct position. | If you see any temperaments listed in the wrong order, or see any temperaments in the wrong "approx. number of notes needed" category, please move them to the correct position. | ||
| Line 48: | Line 47: | ||
--> | --> | ||
=== Full prime limits === | |||
{| class="wikitable center-all" | {| class="wikitable center-all" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
| | | | ||
| [[lupercalia]]+++, [[nautilus]]+++, [[negroni]]+++, [[injera]]+ | | [[lupercalia]]+++, [[nautilus]]+++, [[negroni]]+++, [[injera]]+ | ||
|} | |||
=== Other subgroups === | |||
{| class="wikitable center-all" | |||
|- | |||
! JI subgroup | |||
! ~10 notes per equave<ref group="note">Number of notes per equave was estimated by multiplying the temperament’s [[graham complexity]] by 2.</ref> | |||
! ~20 notes | |||
! ~30 notes | |||
! ~40 notes | |||
|- | |- | ||
! 2.3.5.7.other ''n'' | ! 2.3.5.7.other ''n'' | ||