Orwellismic family: Difference between revisions

Units & misc. cleanup
Switch to Sintel's badness, per community consensus
Line 25: Line 25:
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 4, 5, 9, 17, 18, 22, 27, 31, 53, 80, 84, 111, 164d, 195d, 275d, 306d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 4, 5, 9, 17, 18, 22, 27, 31, 53, 80, 84, 111, 164d, 195d, 275d, 306d }}


[[Badness]] (Smith): 0.187 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]] (Sintel): 0.826


[[Projection pair]]: ~5 = 1728/343 to 2.3.7
[[Projection pair]]: ~5 = 1728/343 to 2.3.7
Line 53: Line 53:
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 22, 27e, 31, 53, 58, 80, 111, 280cd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 22, 27e, 31, 53, 58, 80, 111, 280cd }}


[[Badness]] (Smith): 0.411 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]] (Sintel): 0.494


[[Projection pair]]s: ~5 = 1728/343, ~11 = 186624/16807 to 2.3.7
[[Projection pair]]s: ~5 = 1728/343, ~11 = 186624/16807 to 2.3.7
Line 71: Line 71:
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 22, 27e, 31, 53, 58, 80, 111, 280cdf }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 22, 27e, 31, 53, 58, 80, 111, 280cdf }}


Badness (Smith): 0.758 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness (Sintel): 0.708


Projection pairs: ~5 = 1728/343, ~11 = 186624/16807, ~13 = 221184/16897 to 2.3.7
Projection pairs: ~5 = 1728/343, ~11 = 186624/16807, ~13 = 221184/16897 to 2.3.7
Line 86: Line 86:
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 22f, 27e, 31, 49f, 58, 138cdeff, 196cdefff, 254ccdeeffff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 22f, 27e, 31, 49f, 58, 138cdeff, 196cdefff, 254ccdeeffff }}


Badness (Smith): 0.904 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness (Sintel): 0.845


Projection pairs: ~5 = 1728/343, ~11 = 186624/16807, ~13 = 16807/1296 to 2.3.7
Projection pairs: ~5 = 1728/343, ~11 = 186624/16807, ~13 = 16807/1296 to 2.3.7
Line 101: Line 101:
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 4, 5, 9, 17, 22, 31, 53, 84e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 4, 5, 9, 17, 22, 31, 53, 84e }}


[[Badness]] (Smith): 0.715 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]] (Sintel): 0.859


Scales: [[orwellian chromatic]]
Scales: [[orwellian chromatic]]