Constrained tuning/Analytical solution to constrained Euclidean tunings: Difference between revisions

More explanations and mark the open problem
CEE tuning: I don't think these are ever gonna be solved, so I'm gonna discuss them as plain observations
 
Line 38: Line 38:
<math>\displaystyle M_I = [ \begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & \ldots & 0 \end{matrix} \rangle</math>
<math>\displaystyle M_I = [ \begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & \ldots & 0 \end{matrix} \rangle</math>


but it works as long as it is the first ''r'' elements of the [[subgroup basis matrix|subgroup basis]].  
The following observations work as long as the constraint is the first ''r'' elements of the [[subgroup basis matrix|subgroup basis]].  


We will denote the Frobenius projection map by ''P''<sub>F</sub>. The goal is to work out the constrained projection map ''P''<sub>C</sub>, which, like ''P''<sub>F</sub>, also satisfies
We will denote the Frobenius projection map by ''P''<sub>F</sub>. The goal is to work out the constrained projection map ''P''<sub>C</sub>, which, like ''P''<sub>F</sub>, also satisfies
Line 53: Line 53:
<math>\displaystyle P_{\rm C} M_I = M_I</math>
<math>\displaystyle P_{\rm C} M_I = M_I</math>


Notice<ref group="note">It is not known yet why this is the case.</ref>
For an arbitrary projection map ''P'' of the same temperament, notice
 
<math>\displaystyle P_{\rm F} = P^+ P</math>
 
so if we substitute ''P''<sub>C</sub> for ''P'', we have


<math>\displaystyle P_{\rm F} = P_{\rm C}^+P_{\rm C}</math>
<math>\displaystyle P_{\rm F} = P_{\rm C}^+P_{\rm C}</math>


That makes the pseudoinverse of ''P''<sub>C</sub> easier to work with than ''P''<sub>C</sub> itself, as
and


<math>\displaystyle  
<math>\displaystyle  
Line 67: Line 71:
Since ''PM''<sub>''I''</sub> is the tuning of ''M''<sub>''I''</sub> in terms of monzos, which is just the slice of the first ''r'' columns of ''P'' in this case, it follows that {{subsup|''P''|C|+}} and ''P''<sub>F</sub> share the first ''r'' columns.
Since ''PM''<sub>''I''</sub> is the tuning of ''M''<sub>''I''</sub> in terms of monzos, which is just the slice of the first ''r'' columns of ''P'' in this case, it follows that {{subsup|''P''|C|+}} and ''P''<sub>F</sub> share the first ''r'' columns.


With the first ''r'' rows and columns removed, the remaining part in the mapping is another invariant of the temperament, which will be dubbed the minor matrix, denoted ''V''<sub>M</sub>. The minor matrix of the projection map
With the first ''r'' rows and columns removed, the remaining part in the mapping is another invariant of the temperament, which will be dubbed the minor matrix, denoted ''V''<sub>M</sub>. We observe that the minor matrix of the projection map


<math>\displaystyle P_{\rm M} = V_{\rm M}^+ V_{\rm M} </math>
<math>\displaystyle P_{\rm M} = V_{\rm M}^+ V_{\rm M} </math>


forms an orthogonal projection map filling the bottom-right section of ''P''<sub>C</sub><sup>+</sup>.  
forms an orthogonal projection map filling the bottom-right section of ''P''<sub>C</sub><sup>+</sup>, and the top-right section comprises only zeros.  


Therefore, in general, if ''M''<sub>''I''</sub> is the first ''r'' elements of the subgroup basis, then ''P''<sub>C</sub> is of the form
Therefore, in general, if ''M''<sub>''I''</sub> is the first ''r'' elements of the subgroup basis, then ''P''<sub>C</sub> is of the form