Talk:POTE tuning: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:57, 9 July 2025 view source Fredg999 (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 6,849 edits m →Justification: Fix order of replies ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:02, 9 July 2025 view source Hkm (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 1,059 edits →Justification Newer edit →
Line 61:		Line 61:

	:: Just because you can think of it that way doesn't mean you should. Switching to projective space has no benefits when talking about optimization. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 00:00, 9 July 2025 (UTC)		:: Just because you can think of it that way doesn't mean you should. Switching to projective space has no benefits when talking about optimization. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 00:00, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

			:: Are there any temperaments where you prefer the POTE tuning to the CTE tuning? We can also compare with the tunings from [[Path-based goodness]].