Dual-fifth temperaments: Difference between revisions

Lériendil (talk | contribs)
Xenllium (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


Alternatively, dual-fifth temperaments can be analyzed in a more conventional way as [[subgroup temperament]]s, where one of the fifths is mapped to [[3/2]] and the other is mapped to a nearby [[wolf interval|wolf fifth]] (such as [[64/43]], which is convenient since 2.3.43 is the same subgroup as 2.3.64/43).
Alternatively, dual-fifth temperaments can be analyzed in a more conventional way as [[subgroup temperament]]s, where one of the fifths is mapped to [[3/2]] and the other is mapped to a nearby [[wolf interval|wolf fifth]] (such as [[64/43]], which is convenient since 2.3.43 is the same subgroup as 2.3.64/43).
== Dual-3 Spell ==
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3⁻.3⁺.5
[[Comma|Comma basis]]: [[25/24|{{monzo| -3 0 -1 2 }}]], [[81/80|{{monzo| -4 2 2 -1 }}]]
Mapping: [{{val| 1 2 1 2 }}, {{val| 0 -3 4 2 }}]
2.9.5 [[POTE]] generator: ~(3⁻×3⁺)/8 = 192.4773
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 6, 13, 19 }}


== Dual-3 A-Team ==
== Dual-3 A-Team ==
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3⁻.3⁺.5
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3⁻.3⁺.5


[[Comma]]s: [[81/80|{{monzo| -4 2 2 -1 }}]], {{monzo| -8 1 4 0 }}
[[Comma|Comma basis]]: [[81/80|{{monzo| -4 2 2 -1 }}]], [[256/243|{{monzo| 8 -1 -4 0 }}]]


Mapping: [{{val| 1 0 2 0 }}, {{val| 0 4 -1 6 }}]
Mapping: [{{val| 1 0 2 0 }}, {{val| 0 4 -1 6 }}]


2.9.5 [[POTE]] generator: 464.1591
2.9.5 [[POTE]] generator: ~3⁺/2 = 735.8409


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 13, 18, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 13, 18, 31 }}
Line 20: Line 31:
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3⁻.3⁺.5
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3⁻.3⁺.5


[[Comma]]s: [[81/80|{{monzo| -4 2 2 -1 }}]], {{monzo| 2 -3 0 1 }}
[[Comma|Comma basis]]: [[25/24|{{monzo| -3 1 -2 2 }}]], [[81/80|{{monzo| -4 2 2 -1 }}]]


Mapping: [{{val| 1 0 1 -2 }}, {{val| 0 2 1 6 }}]
Mapping: [{{val| 1 1 3 4 }}, {{val| 0 2 -5 -6 }}]


2.9.5 [[POTE]] generator: 335.8409
2.9.5 [[POTE]] generator: ~(2×3⁺)/5 = 335.8409


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 18, 25, 43 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 18, 25, 43 }}
Line 31: Line 42:
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3⁻.3⁺.5
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3⁻.3⁺.5


2.9.5 [[POTE]] generator: 730.0679
[[Comma|Comma basis]]: [[25/24|{{monzo| -3 1 -2 2 }}]], [[256/243|{{monzo| 8 -1 -4 0 }}]]
 
Mapping: [{{val| 2 8 2 1 }}, {{val| 0 -4 1 3 }}]


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|18, 28}}
2.9.5 [[POTE]] generator: ~3⁺/2 = 730.0679


{{Todo|review|inline=1|comment=explicitly write out commas and vals for Dual-3 Octokaidecal}}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 18, 28 }}


== Megapyth ==
== Megapyth ==
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3⁻.3⁺.5.7
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3⁻.3⁺.5.7


[[Comma]]s: {{monzo| -4 3 1 -1 0 }}, {{monzo| 6 0 -2 0 -1 }}, {{monzo| -5 -1 6 0 0 }}
[[Comma|Comma basis]]: {{monzo| -4 3 1 -1 0 }}, {{monzo| 6 0 -2 0 -1 }}, {{monzo| -5 -1 6 0 0 }}


Mapping: [{{val| 1 1 1 0 4 }}, {{val| 0 6 1 19 -2 }}]
Mapping: [{{val| 1 1 1 0 4 }}, {{val| 0 6 1 19 -2 }}]
Line 46: Line 59:
2.9.5.7 [[POTE]] generator: ~3⁺/2 = 715.319
2.9.5.7 [[POTE]] generator: ~3⁺/2 = 715.319


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|47b, 52b}}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 47b, 52b }}


== Duofamity (Rank-3) ==
== Duofamity (Rank-3) ==
Line 55: Line 68:
Least-squares for 5/4, 9/8, and 8/7: 690.155, 715.325
Least-squares for 5/4, 9/8, and 8/7: 690.155, 715.325


[[Comma]]s: {{monzo| -4 3 1 -1 0 }}, {{monzo| 6 0 -2 0 -1 }}
[[Comma|Comma basis]]: {{monzo| -4 3 1 -1 0 }}, {{monzo| 6 0 -2 0 -1 }}


Mapping: [{{val| 1 0 0 -4 6 }}, {{val| 0 1 0 3 0 }}, {{val| 0 0 1 1 -2 }}]
Mapping: [{{val| 1 0 0 -4 6 }}, {{val| 0 1 0 3 0 }}, {{val| 0 0 1 1 -2 }}]
Line 64: Line 77:
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.97
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.97


[[Comma]]s: [[177147/163840]], 2619/2560
[[Comma|Comma basis]]: [[177147/163840]], 2619/2560


{{Mapping|legend=2|1 1 -4 2|0 1 11 8}}
{{Mapping|legend=2|1 1 -4 2|0 1 11 8}}
Line 73: Line 86:


== [[Ripple]] ==
== [[Ripple]] ==
Subgroup: 2.3⁻.9.5.7.11
Subgroup: 2.3⁻.3⁺.5.7.11


See [[ripple]].
See [[ripple]].