Regular temperament: Difference between revisions
m →Lists of temperaments: add bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
Although the concept of regular temperament is centuries old and predates much of modern mathematics, members of the Yahoo! Alternative Tuning List have developed a particular form of numerical shorthand for describing the properties of temperaments. The most important of these are [[val]]s ([[mapping]]s), [[monzo]]s and [[tempering out|tempering out comma]]s, which any student of the modern regular temperament paradigm should become familiar with. These concepts are rather straightforward and require little math to understand. | Although the concept of regular temperament is centuries old and predates much of modern mathematics, members of the Yahoo! Alternative Tuning List have developed a particular form of numerical shorthand for describing the properties of temperaments. The most important of these are [[val]]s ([[mapping]]s), [[monzo]]s and [[tempering out|tempering out comma]]s, which any student of the modern regular temperament paradigm should become familiar with. These concepts are rather straightforward and require little math to understand. | ||
The [[rank]] of a temperament is its dimension. It equals the number of [[ | The [[rank]] of a temperament is its dimension. It equals the number of generators in the [[Just intonation subgroup|subgroup]] being used minus the number of independent commas that are tempered out. | ||
Another recent contribution to the field of temperament is the concept of [[optimization]], which can take many forms. The point of optimization is to minimize the difference between a temperament and JI by finding an optimal tuning for the generator. The most frequently used forms of optimization are [[POTE tuning|POTE]] ("Pure-Octave Tenney–Euclidean"), [[TOP tuning|TOP]] ("Tenney OPtimal", or "Tempered Octaves, Please") and more recently [[CTE]] ("Constained Tenney–Euclidean"), which has become the new standard instead of POTE since POTE is meant to be an approximation. Optimization is rather intensive mathematically, but it is seldom left as an exercise to the reader; most temperaments are presented here in their optimal forms in terms of POTE and CTE generators. In addition, for each temperament there is a [[optimal ET sequence|sequence of equal temperaments]] showing possible [[equal-step tuning]]s in the order of better absolute accuracy to JI. | Another recent contribution to the field of temperament is the concept of [[optimization]], which can take many forms. The point of optimization is to minimize the difference between a temperament and JI by finding an optimal tuning for the generator. The most frequently used forms of optimization are [[POTE tuning|POTE]] ("Pure-Octave Tenney–Euclidean"), [[TOP tuning|TOP]] ("Tenney OPtimal", or "Tempered Octaves, Please") and more recently [[CTE]] ("Constained Tenney–Euclidean"), which has become the new standard instead of POTE since POTE is meant to be an approximation. Optimization is rather intensive mathematically, but it is seldom left as an exercise to the reader; most temperaments are presented here in their optimal forms in terms of POTE and CTE generators. In addition, for each temperament there is a [[optimal ET sequence|sequence of equal temperaments]] showing possible [[equal-step tuning]]s in the order of better absolute accuracy to JI. | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
The most common browser tools used for finding optimal tunings (useful for investigating new temperaments) are [[Graham Breed]]'s [http://x31eq.com/temper/ Temperament Finder] and [[User:Sintel|sintel]]'s [https://sintel.pythonanywhere.com/ Temperament Calculator]; the former gives temperament names (usually consistent with the wiki) and implements a wide variety of features like finding related temperaments while the latter implements CTE and more complex types of subgroups (like allowing ratios as generators) and supports an alternative notation to [[warts]] that is more convenient for arbitrary subgroups. | The most common browser tools used for finding optimal tunings (useful for investigating new temperaments) are [[Graham Breed]]'s [http://x31eq.com/temper/ Temperament Finder] and [[User:Sintel|sintel]]'s [https://sintel.pythonanywhere.com/ Temperament Calculator]; the former gives temperament names (usually consistent with the wiki) and implements a wide variety of features like finding related temperaments while the latter implements CTE and more complex types of subgroups (like allowing ratios as generators) and supports an alternative notation to [[warts]] that is more convenient for arbitrary subgroups. | ||
Usually, temperaments have names coming from a wide array of [[temperament names|sources]], but they can also have systematic and rigorous names, from which the comma(s) can be deduced. The most common systematic temperament naming system on the wiki is [[color notation]]: {{nowrap|wa {{=}} 3-limit|yo {{=}} 5-over|gu {{=}} 5-under|zo {{=}} 7-over|and ru {{=}} 7-under}} (see also [[Color notation/Temperament names]]). | |||
Yet another recent development is the concept of a [[pergen]], appearing in our [[tour of regular temperaments]] as (P8, P5/2) or somesuch, which classifies temperaments by their period and the generator(s), giving ideas of how to notate these temperaments. For rank-2 temperaments we have developed a similar classification system called [[ploidacot]]. | Yet another recent development is the concept of a [[pergen]], appearing in our [[tour of regular temperaments]] as (P8, P5/2) or somesuch, which classifies temperaments by their period and the generator(s), giving ideas of how to notate these temperaments. For rank-2 temperaments we have developed a similar classification system called [[ploidacot]]. | ||