Undim family: Difference between revisions
→Septimal undim: +intro to note its utility |
Cleanup |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''undim family''' tempers out {{monzo| 41 -20 -4 }}, equating the [[Pythagorean comma]] with a stack of four [[schisma]]s | The '''undim family''' of [[regular temperaments|temperaments]] [[tempering out|tempers out]] the [[undim comma]], {{monzo| 41 -20 -4 }}, equating the [[Pythagorean comma]] with a stack of four [[schisma]]s. This makes it a member of the [[schismic–Pythagorean equivalence continuum]], with {{nowrap| ''n'' {{=}} 4 }}. | ||
The second comma of the [[normal comma list]] defines which 7-limit family member we are looking at. Septimal undim (140 & | The name ''undim'' was given by [[Petr Pařízek]] in 2011 for it is some sort of opposite to [[diminished (temperament)|diminished]]<ref>[https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_101780.html Yahoo! Tuning Group | ''Suggested names for the unclasified temperaments'']</ref>. | ||
The second comma of the [[normal comma list]] defines which 7-limit family member we are looking at. Septimal undim ({{nowrap| 140 & 152 }}) tempers out 5120/5103 (hemifamity). Unlit ({{nowrap| 152 & 316 }}) does 4375/4374 (ragisma) instead. Twilight ({{nowrap| 152 & 176 }}) adds 6144/6125 (porwell) to the comma list and splits the period into two – 1/8 of an octave. | |||
== Undim == | == Undim == | ||
Undim features a quarter-octave period, which acts as the [[1215/1024|ptolemaic augmented second (1215/1024)]]. That and five [[4/3|perfect fourths]] (i.e. a minor second, ~[[256/243]]) gives the interval class of 5. | |||
Note that all versions of undim (ones that do not already map 19 differently and more accurately) have an obvious extension to prime 19 by observing that sharpening 1215/1024 by [[1216/1215]] results in [[19/16]], thus mapping 19/16 to [[4edo|1\4]]. This interpretation is arguably much more harmonically plausible, owing to its simplicity and thereby greater tolerance to mistuning. | Note that all versions of undim (ones that do not already map 19 differently and more accurately) have an obvious extension to prime 19 by observing that sharpening 1215/1024 by [[1216/1215]] results in [[19/16]], thus mapping 19/16 to [[4edo|1\4]]. This interpretation is arguably much more harmonically plausible, owing to its simplicity and thereby greater tolerance to mistuning. | ||
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5 | [[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5 | ||
[[Comma list]]: {{monzo| 41 -20 -4 }} | [[Comma list]]: {{monzo| 41 -20 -4 }} | ||
{{Mapping|legend=1| 4 0 41 | 0 1 -5 }} | {{Mapping|legend=1| 4 0 41 | 0 1 -5 }} | ||
Line 14: | Line 18: | ||
: mapping generators: ~1215/1024, ~3 | : mapping generators: ~1215/1024, ~3 | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~1215/1024 = | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~1215/1024 = 300.0000, ~3/2 = 702.6054 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, …, 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 620, 772, 924c, 1076bc, 1228bc }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, …, 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 620, 772, 924c, 1076bc, 1228bc }} | ||
Line 21: | Line 25: | ||
== Septimal undim == | == Septimal undim == | ||
Septimal undim tempers out the [[dimcomp comma]], mapping ~25/21 to the 1/4-octave period. It can be described as 12 & 140, and is the unique temperament that equates a syntonic~septimal comma with a stack of three [[marvel comma]]s. A [[Pythagorean comma]] is then found as a stack of four marvel commas. In some 7-limit adaptive-tuning practice, the marvel comma corresponds to a melodic unit called a [[kleisma]], with three kleismas making a comma, so this temperament may be useful for modeling that. [[292edo]] makes for an excellent tuning. | Septimal undim tempers out the [[dimcomp comma]], mapping ~25/21 to the 1/4-octave period. It can be described as {{nowrap| 12 & 140 }}, and is the unique temperament that equates a syntonic~septimal comma with a stack of three [[marvel comma]]s. A [[Pythagorean comma]] is then found as a stack of four marvel commas. In some 7-limit adaptive-tuning practice, the marvel comma corresponds to a melodic unit called a [[kleisma (interval region)|kleisma]], with three kleismas making a comma, so this temperament may be useful for modeling that. [[292edo]] makes for an excellent tuning. | ||
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7 | [[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7 | ||
Line 31: | Line 35: | ||
{{Multival|legend=1| 4 -20 -44 -41 -81 -46 }} | {{Multival|legend=1| 4 -20 -44 -41 -81 -46 }} | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~25/21 = 300. | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~25/21 = 300.0000, ~3/2 = 702.7362 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 140, 152, 292 }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 140, 152, 292 }} | ||
Line 70: | Line 74: | ||
{{Mapping|legend=1| 4 0 41 -160 | 0 1 -5 27 }} | {{Mapping|legend=1| 4 0 41 -160 | 0 1 -5 27 }} | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~1215/1024 = | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~1215/1024 = 300.0000, ~3/2 = 702.5764 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 152, 316, 468, 620, 1088bcd, 1708bccdd }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 152, 316, 468, 620, 1088bcd, 1708bccdd }} | ||
Line 83: | Line 87: | ||
Mapping: {{mapping| 4 0 41 -160 -113 | 0 1 -5 27 20 }} | Mapping: {{mapping| 4 0 41 -160 -113 | 0 1 -5 27 20 }} | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~1215/1024 = | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~1215/1024 = 300.0000, ~3/2 = 702.5826 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend= | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 152, 468, 620 }} | ||
Badness: 0.070215 | Badness: 0.070215 | ||
Line 96: | Line 100: | ||
Mapping: {{mapping| 4 0 41 -160 -113 -334 | 0 1 -5 27 20 55 }} | Mapping: {{mapping| 4 0 41 -160 -113 -334 | 0 1 -5 27 20 55 }} | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~1215/1024 = | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~1215/1024 = 300.0000, ~3/2 = 702.5741 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend= | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 152f, 316, 468, 620f, 1088bcdf }} | ||
Badness: 0.058390 | Badness: 0.058390 | ||
Line 111: | Line 115: | ||
: mapping generators: ~7168/6561, ~3 | : mapping generators: ~7168/6561, ~3 | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~7168/6561 = | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~7168/6561 = 150.0000, ~3/2 = 702.5090 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 152, 328, 480, 1592bccddd }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 152, 328, 480, 1592bccddd }} | ||
Line 124: | Line 128: | ||
Mapping: {{mapping| 8 0 82 -79 15 | 0 1 -5 8 1 }} | Mapping: {{mapping| 8 0 82 -79 15 | 0 1 -5 8 1 }} | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~12/11 = | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~12/11 = 150.0000, ~3/2 = 702.5090 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend= | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 152, 328, 480, 1112bccddee, 1592bccdddeee }} | ||
Badness: 0.048007 | Badness: 0.048007 | ||
Line 137: | Line 141: | ||
Mapping: {{mapping| 8 0 82 -79 15 -186 | 0 1 -5 8 1 17 }} | Mapping: {{mapping| 8 0 82 -79 15 -186 | 0 1 -5 8 1 17 }} | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~12/11 = | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~12/11 = 150.0000, ~3/2 = 702.4773 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend= | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 152f, 328, 480f, 808cdeff }} | ||
Badness: 0.041365 | Badness: 0.041365 |