Consonance and dissonance: Difference between revisions
Tag: Undo |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Musical dissonance is a complex phenomenon depending on not only the fundamental frequency ratio but also the register, timbres, volume, spatialization, and the listener's conditioning and cultural background. '''Sensory dissonance''', '''discordance''', '''discord''', or '''roughness''', however, is a psychoacoustic effect that is much more consistent among most human listeners except for those with conditions like congenital amusia (tone deafness). In its most basic form, sensory dissonance occurs when two sine wave tones in the audible frequency range are played simultaneously, within about a critical band of each other but far apart enough that beating is not audible. The opposite is '''sensory consonance''', '''concordance''', '''concord''' or '''smoothness'''. '''''Cordance''''' has been proposed by [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] as a term for the degree of psychoacoustic concordance and discordance, by analogy with the term ''sonance'' (see above), to lessen the common confusion between psychoacoustic concordance/discordance and musical consonance/dissonance. | Musical dissonance is a complex phenomenon depending on not only the fundamental frequency ratio but also the register, timbres, volume, spatialization, and the listener's conditioning and cultural background. '''Sensory dissonance''', '''discordance''', '''discord''', or '''roughness''', however, is a psychoacoustic effect that is much more consistent among most human listeners except for those with conditions like congenital amusia (tone deafness). In its most basic form, sensory dissonance occurs when two sine wave tones in the audible frequency range are played simultaneously, within about a critical band of each other but far apart enough that beating is not audible. The opposite is '''sensory consonance''', '''concordance''', '''concord''' or '''smoothness'''. '''''Cordance''''' has been proposed by [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] as a term for the degree of psychoacoustic concordance and discordance, by analogy with the term ''sonance'' (see above), to lessen the common confusion between psychoacoustic concordance/discordance and musical consonance/dissonance. | ||
A study by Kameoka & Kuriyagawa in 1969 had listeners grade the roughness of two sine waves played simultaneously at equal intensity. They computed that if the lower sine wave has frequency ''f''<sub>1</sub> Hz, then the upper frequency that maximizes roughness is about < | A study by Kameoka & Kuriyagawa in 1969 had listeners grade the roughness of two sine waves played simultaneously at equal intensity. They computed that if the lower sine wave has frequency ''f''<sub>1</sub> Hz, then the upper frequency that maximizes roughness is about {{nowrap|''f''<sub>2</sub> {{=}} ''f''<sub>1</sub> + 2.27{{subsup|''f'' |1|0.477}}}} (we will call this the ''maximal roughness formula''). This assumes that each sine wave has intensity 57 dB SPL; the formula changes slightly depending on volume. The interval {{sfrac|''f''<sub>2</sub>|''f''<sub>1</sub>}} is about 1.56 semitones at 440 Hz, and narrows as frequency increases. | ||
The same authors propose a measurement of sensory dissonance between two arbitrary sine waves, broadly modeled as follows: two identical frequencies have a dissonance of 0, the maximal roughness formula gives a dissonance of 1, and two frequencies at an octave or greater have dissonance 0. From zero difference to maximal roughness linear interpolation is used, and from maximal roughness to an octave a gradual decay. Note, however, that this is the result of one study; subsequent replication attempts have produced somewhat different formulas, and this particular study has been critically re-evaluated such as by [https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/24077/EMR000007a-mashinter.pdf?sequence=1 Mashinter in 2006]. | The same authors propose a measurement of sensory dissonance between two arbitrary sine waves, broadly modeled as follows: two identical frequencies have a dissonance of 0, the maximal roughness formula gives a dissonance of 1, and two frequencies at an octave or greater have dissonance 0. From zero difference to maximal roughness linear interpolation is used, and from maximal roughness to an octave a gradual decay. Note, however, that this is the result of one study; subsequent replication attempts have produced somewhat different formulas, and this particular study has been critically re-evaluated such as by [https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/24077/EMR000007a-mashinter.pdf?sequence=1 Mashinter in 2006]. | ||