Xenharmonic Wiki

Augmented family: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Move ternary to very low-accuracy temps
m Re-adopt template: Optimal ET sequence
Line 59: Line 59:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 692.514 (~16/15 = 107.486)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 692.514 (~16/15 = 107.486)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 9, 12, 21, 33e, 45cde }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 12, 21, 33e, 45cde }}


Badness (Smith): 0.020191
Badness (Smith): 0.020191
Line 74: Line 74:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 688.783 (~16/15 = 111.217)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 688.783 (~16/15 = 111.217)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 9, 12f, 21, 33ef, 54bceeff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 12f, 21, 33ef, 54bceeff }}


Badness (Smith): 0.018448
Badness (Smith): 0.018448
Line 89: Line 89:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 685.356 (~16/15 = 114.644)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 685.356 (~16/15 = 114.644)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 9, 12, 21f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 12, 21f }}


Badness (Smith): 0.022236
Badness (Smith): 0.022236
Line 127: Line 127:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 711.177 (~21/20 = 88.823)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 711.177 (~21/20 = 88.823)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 12, 15, 27e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 15, 27e }}


Badness (Smith): 0.019613
Badness (Smith): 0.019613
Line 142: Line 142:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 712.013 (~21/20 = 87.987)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 712.013 (~21/20 = 87.987)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 12f, 15, 27eff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 15, 27eff }}


Badness (Smith): 0.020785
Badness (Smith): 0.020785
Line 157: Line 157:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 712.609 (~21/20 = 87.391)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 712.609 (~21/20 = 87.391)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 12, 15, 27e, 69bceef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 15, 27e, 69bceef }}


Badness (Smith): 0.022890
Badness (Smith): 0.022890
Line 172: Line 172:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 709.677 (~21/20 = 90.323)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 709.677 (~21/20 = 90.323)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 12f, 27e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 27e }}


Badness (Smith): 0.023113
Badness (Smith): 0.023113
Line 187: Line 187:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 714.150 (~21/20 = 85.850)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 714.150 (~21/20 = 85.850)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 12e, 15, 27, 42 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12e, 15, 27, 42 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.035554
Badness (Smith): 0.035554
Line 221: Line 221:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 722.663 (~25/24 = 77.337)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 722.663 (~25/24 = 77.337)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 3de, 12de, 15 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 3de, 12de, 15 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.031171
Badness (Smith): 0.031171
Line 255: Line 255:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 680.042 (~16/15 = 119.958)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~3/2 = 680.042 (~16/15 = 119.958)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 3, 9 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 3, 9 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.037183
Badness (Smith): 0.037183
Line 291: Line 291:
* POTE: ~28/25 = 200.000, ~3/2 = 714.304 (~16/15 = 85.696)
* POTE: ~28/25 = 200.000, ~3/2 = 714.304 (~16/15 = 85.696)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 6, 12, 30dee, 42ddeee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 6, 12, 30dee, 42ddeee }}


Badness (Smith): 0.038412
Badness (Smith): 0.038412
Line 306: Line 306:
* POTE: ~28/25 = 200.000, ~3/2 = 710.005 (~16/15 = 89.995)
* POTE: ~28/25 = 200.000, ~3/2 = 710.005 (~16/15 = 89.995)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 6f, 12f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 6f, 12f }}


Badness (Smith): 0.035946
Badness (Smith): 0.035946
Line 346: Line 346:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~7/4 = 952.932 (~12/11 = 152.932)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~7/4 = 952.932 (~12/11 = 152.932)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 6, 9, 15, 24, 39 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 6, 9, 15, 24, 39 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.026152
Badness (Smith): 0.026152
Line 365: Line 365:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~7/4 = 951.687 (~12/11 = 151.687)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~7/4 = 951.687 (~12/11 = 151.687)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 6, 9, 15, 24 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 6, 9, 15, 24 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.020248
Badness (Smith): 0.020248
Line 385: Line 385:
* POTE: ~44/39 = 200.000, ~7/4 = 953.358 (~40/39 = 46.642)
* POTE: ~44/39 = 200.000, ~7/4 = 953.358 (~40/39 = 46.642)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 6, 18bd, 24 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 6, 18bd, 24 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.059160
Badness (Smith): 0.059160
Line 421: Line 421:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~14/9 = 754.212 (~36/35 = 45.788)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~14/9 = 754.212 (~36/35 = 45.788)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 24, 27e, 51ce }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 24, 27e, 51ce }}


Badness (Smith): 0.038232
Badness (Smith): 0.038232
Line 436: Line 436:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~14/9 = 753.750 (~36/35 = 46.250)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~14/9 = 753.750 (~36/35 = 46.250)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 24, 27e, 51ce }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 24, 27e, 51ce }}


Badness (Smith): 0.030159
Badness (Smith): 0.030159
Line 472: Line 472:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~32/21 = 748.345 (~33/32 = 51.655)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~32/21 = 748.345 (~33/32 = 51.655)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 21, 24 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 21, 24 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.068062
Badness (Smith): 0.068062
Line 487: Line 487:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~32/21 = 748.452 (~33/32 = 51.548)
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~32/21 = 748.452 (~33/32 = 51.548)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 21, 24 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 21, 24 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.042289
Badness (Smith): 0.042289
Line 523: Line 523:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~11/10 = 176.981
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~11/10 = 176.981


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 6, 21, 27e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 6, 21, 27e }}


Badness (Smith): 0.059192
Badness (Smith): 0.059192
Line 538: Line 538:
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~11/10 = 176.551
* POTE: ~5/4 = 400.000, ~11/10 = 176.551


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 6, 21, 27e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 6, 21, 27e }}


Badness (Smith): 0.042323
Badness (Smith): 0.042323
Line 574: Line 574:
* POTE: ~54/49 = 200.000, ~18/11 = 855.220 (~36/35 = 55.220)
* POTE: ~54/49 = 200.000, ~18/11 = 855.220 (~36/35 = 55.220)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 24, 42e, 66ce, 108bccee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 24, 42e, 66ce, 108bccee }}


Badness (Smith): 0.080738
Badness (Smith): 0.080738
Line 612: Line 612:
* POTE: ~12/11 = 133.333, ~3/2 = 706.726 (~36/35 = 40.059)
* POTE: ~12/11 = 133.333, ~3/2 = 706.726 (~36/35 = 40.059)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 9, 18e, 27e, 63cee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 18e, 27e, 63cee }}


Badness (Smith): 0.034861
Badness (Smith): 0.034861
Line 627: Line 627:
* POTE: ~14/13 = 133.333, ~3/2 = 706.889 (~36/35 = 40.222)
* POTE: ~14/13 = 133.333, ~3/2 = 706.889 (~36/35 = 40.222)


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 9, 18e, 27e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 18e, 27e }}


Badness (Smith): 0.024143
Badness (Smith): 0.024143
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/Augmented_family"