Xenharmonic Wiki

Archytas clan: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
+error maps
m Re-adopt template: Optimal ET sequence
Line 67: Line 67:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 707.192
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 707.192


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 5, 12, 17, 39d, 56d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 12, 17, 39d, 56d }}


Badness (Smith): 0.00933
Badness (Smith): 0.00933
Line 88: Line 88:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 706.137
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 706.137


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 12f, 17 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 17 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.0111
Badness (Smith): 0.0111
Line 147: Line 147:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 710.175
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 710.175


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 22, 27e, 49 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 22, 27e, 49 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.024976
Badness (Smith): 0.024976
Line 162: Line 162:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 710.479
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 710.479


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 22, 27e, 49, 76bcde }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 22, 27e, 49, 76bcde }}


Badness (Smith): 0.024673
Badness (Smith): 0.024673
Line 177: Line 177:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~16/13 = 355.036
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~16/13 = 355.036


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 27e, 44, 71d, 98bde }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 27e, 44, 71d, 98bde }}


Badness (Smith): 0.049183
Badness (Smith): 0.049183
Line 194: Line 194:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 709.495
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 709.495


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 5, 17, 22 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 17, 22 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.032768
Badness (Smith): 0.032768
Line 209: Line 209:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 708.703
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 708.703


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 5f, 17, 22 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5f, 17, 22 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.036336
Badness (Smith): 0.036336
Line 247: Line 247:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 708.205
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 708.205


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 17c, 22, 39d, 61d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17c, 22, 39d, 61d }}


Badness (Smith): 0.032203
Badness (Smith): 0.032203
Line 262: Line 262:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 708.004
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 708.004


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 17c, 22, 39d, 61df, 100bcdf }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17c, 22, 39d, 61df, 100bcdf }}


Badness (Smith): 0.030219
Badness (Smith): 0.030219
Line 277: Line 277:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 709.021
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 709.021


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 22 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 22 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.083490
Badness (Smith): 0.083490
Line 313: Line 313:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 713.395
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 713.395


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 5, 32, 37 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 32, 37 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.068238
Badness (Smith): 0.068238
Line 328: Line 328:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 713.500
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 713.500


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 5, 32, 37 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 32, 37 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.049172
Badness (Smith): 0.049172
Line 343: Line 343:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 713.791
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 713.791


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 5e, 32e, 37, 79bce }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5e, 32e, 37, 79bce }}


Badness (Smith): 0.078068
Badness (Smith): 0.078068
Line 358: Line 358:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 713.811
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 713.811


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 5e, 32e, 37, 79bcef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5e, 32e, 37, 79bcef }}


Badness (Smith): 0.045653
Badness (Smith): 0.045653
Line 417: Line 417:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 702.136
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 702.136


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 5c, 7ce, 12, 29de }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5c, 7ce, 12, 29de }}


Badness (Smith): 0.037482
Badness (Smith): 0.037482
Line 456: Line 456:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~49/40 = 356.140
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~49/40 = 356.140


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 10e, 17cee, 27e, 64be, 91bcdee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 10e, 17cee, 27e, 64be, 91bcdee }}


Badness (Smith): 0.045639
Badness (Smith): 0.045639
Line 471: Line 471:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~16/13 = 356.229
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~16/13 = 356.229


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 10e, 27e, 37, 64be }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 10e, 27e, 37, 64be }}


Badness (Smith): 0.030161
Badness (Smith): 0.030161
Line 486: Line 486:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 355.419
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 355.419


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 10, 17c, 27e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 10, 17c, 27e }}


Badness (Smith): 0.032863
Badness (Smith): 0.032863
Line 501: Line 501:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 355.456
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 355.456


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 10, 17c, 27e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 10, 17c, 27e }}


Badness (Smith): 0.022619
Badness (Smith): 0.022619
Line 516: Line 516:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~49/40 = 356.710
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~49/40 = 356.710


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 10, 27, 37 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 10, 27, 37 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.058084
Badness (Smith): 0.058084
Line 531: Line 531:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~16/13 = 356.701
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~16/13 = 356.701


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 10, 27, 37 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 10, 27, 37 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.033971
Badness (Smith): 0.033971
Line 569: Line 569:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 637.915
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 637.915


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 2, 13, 15, 32c, 47bc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 2, 13, 15, 32c, 47bc }}


Badness (Smith): 0.031036
Badness (Smith): 0.031036
Line 584: Line 584:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 637.635
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 637.635


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 15, 17c, 32cf }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 15, 17c, 32cf }}


Badness (Smith): 0.026214
Badness (Smith): 0.026214
Line 599: Line 599:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 636.761
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 636.761


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 2f, 15f, 17c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 2f, 15f, 17c }}


Badness (Smith): 0.032721
Badness (Smith): 0.032721
Line 637: Line 637:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/5 = 577.850
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/5 = 577.850


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 2, 25e, 27e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 2, 25e, 27e }}


Badness (Smith): 0.052054
Badness (Smith): 0.052054
Line 652: Line 652:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/5 = 578.060
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/5 = 578.060


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 2f, 27e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 2f, 27e }}


Badness (Smith): 0.039705
Badness (Smith): 0.039705
Line 709: Line 709:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~6/5 = 337.564
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~6/5 = 337.564


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 7, 25e, 32 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 25e, 32 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.070799
Badness (Smith): 0.070799
Line 724: Line 724:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~6/5 = 337.483
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~6/5 = 337.483


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 7, 25e, 32f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 25e, 32f }}


Badness (Smith): 0.046206
Badness (Smith): 0.046206
Line 739: Line 739:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~6/5 = 337.513
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~6/5 = 337.513


Optimal ET sequence: {{optimal ET sequence| 7, 25e, 32f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 25e, 32f }}


Badness (Smith): 0.039224
Badness (Smith): 0.039224
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/Archytas_clan"