Xenharmonic Wiki

Meantone family: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Normalize, +missing CTE and CWE tunings, +error maps, and misc. cleanup
m Re-adopt template: Optimal ET sequence
Line 146: Line 146:
Algebraic generator: Traverse, the positive real root of ''x''<sup>4</sup> + 2''x'' - 13, or 696.9529 cents.
Algebraic generator: Traverse, the positive real root of ''x''<sup>4</sup> + 2''x'' - 13, or 696.9529 cents.


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 19e, 31, 105, 136b }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 19e, 31, 105, 136b }}


Badness: 0.017027
Badness: 0.017027
Line 168: Line 168:
: eigenmonzo (unchanged-interval) basis: 2.11/9
: eigenmonzo (unchanged-interval) basis: 2.11/9


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 19e, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 19e, 31 }}


Badness: 0.018048
Badness: 0.018048
Line 185: Line 185:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.377
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.377


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12fg, 19eg, 31, 50e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12fg, 19eg, 31, 50e }}


Badness: 0.019037
Badness: 0.019037
Line 200: Line 200:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.273
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.273


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12fghh, 19egh, 31, 50e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12fghh, 19egh, 31, 50e }}


Badness: 0.017846
Badness: 0.017846
Line 217: Line 217:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.448
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.448


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 19eg, 31g }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 19eg, 31g }}


Badness: 0.019433
Badness: 0.019433
Line 232: Line 232:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.394
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.394


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 19egh, 31gh }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 19egh, 31gh }}


Badness: 0.017437
Badness: 0.017437
Line 249: Line 249:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.003
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.003


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 31 }}


Badness: 0.019982
Badness: 0.019982
Line 264: Line 264:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.140
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.140


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 31 }}


Badness: 0.018047
Badness: 0.018047
Line 289: Line 289:
* 13- and 15-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [691.202, 701.955] (1/2-comma to Pyth.)
* 13- and 15-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [691.202, 701.955] (1/2-comma to Pyth.)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 31, 43, 74 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 31, 43, 74 }}


Badness: 0.025899
Badness: 0.025899
Line 304: Line 304:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.335
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.335


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 31, 43, 74g }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 31, 43, 74g }}


Badness: 0.020889
Badness: 0.020889
Line 319: Line 319:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.380
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.380


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 31, 43, 74gh }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 31, 43, 74gh }}


Badness: 0.017611
Badness: 0.017611
Line 340: Line 340:
: eigenmonzo (unchanged-interval) basis: 2.13/9
: eigenmonzo (unchanged-interval) basis: 2.13/9


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 31f, 43 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 31f, 43 }}


Badness: 0.026421
Badness: 0.026421
Line 355: Line 355:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.514
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.514


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12fg, 31fg, 43 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12fg, 31fg, 43 }}


Badness: 0.027706
Badness: 0.027706
Line 370: Line 370:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.481
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.481


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12fghh, 31fgh, 43 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12fghh, 31fgh, 43 }}


Badness: 0.025315
Badness: 0.025315
Line 385: Line 385:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.376
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.376


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 31fg, 43g }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 31fg, 43g }}


Badness: 0.027518
Badness: 0.027518
Line 400: Line 400:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.316
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.316


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 19effgh, 31fgh, 43gh }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 19effgh, 31fgh, 43gh }}


Badness: 0.023613
Badness: 0.023613
Line 415: Line 415:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.644
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.644


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 43 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 43 }}


Badness: 0.023881
Badness: 0.023881
Line 430: Line 430:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.715
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.715


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 43 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 43 }}


Badness: 0.020540
Badness: 0.020540
Line 447: Line 447:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~26/15 = 948.465
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~26/15 = 948.465


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 19e, 43, 62 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19e, 43, 62 }}


Badness: 0.031433
Badness: 0.031433
Line 462: Line 462:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~26/15 = 948.477
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~26/15 = 948.477


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 19eg, 43, 62 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19eg, 43, 62 }}


Badness: 0.023380
Badness: 0.023380
Line 477: Line 477:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~19/11 = 948.473
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~19/11 = 948.473


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 19egh, 43, 62 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19egh, 43, 62 }}


Badness: 0.018952
Badness: 0.018952
Line 494: Line 494:
* POTE: ~55/39 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 697.005
* POTE: ~55/39 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 697.005


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 38deefff, 50eff, 62, 136b }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 38deefff, 50eff, 62, 136b }}


Badness: 0.040668
Badness: 0.040668
Line 509: Line 509:
* POTE: ~17/12 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 696.927
* POTE: ~17/12 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 696.927


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 50eff, 62, 136bg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 50eff, 62, 136bg }}


Badness: 0.031491
Badness: 0.031491
Line 524: Line 524:
* POTE: ~17/12 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 696.906
* POTE: ~17/12 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 696.906


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 50eff, 62 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 50eff, 62 }}


Badness: 0.024206
Badness: 0.024206
Line 558: Line 558:
Algebraic generator: Cybozem; or else Radieubiz, the real root of 3''x''<sup>3</sup> + 6''x'' - 19. Unlike Cybozem, the recurrence for Radieubiz does not converge.
Algebraic generator: Cybozem; or else Radieubiz, the real root of 3''x''<sup>3</sup> + 6''x'' - 19. Unlike Cybozem, the recurrence for Radieubiz does not converge.


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12e, 19, 31, 81, 112b }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12e, 19, 31, 81, 112b }}


Badness: 0.021543
Badness: 0.021543
Line 587: Line 587:
* 13- and 15-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [691.202, 701.955] (1/2-comma to Pyth.)
* 13- and 15-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [691.202, 701.955] (1/2-comma to Pyth.)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 19, 31, 50, 81 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19, 31, 50, 81 }}


Badness: 0.020883
Badness: 0.020883
Line 602: Line 602:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.194
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.194


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 19g, 31, 50, 81, 131bd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19g, 31, 50, 81, 131bd }}


Badness: 0.019953
Badness: 0.019953
Line 617: Line 617:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.188
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.188


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 19gh, 31, 50, 81 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19gh, 31, 50, 81 }}


Badness: 0.017791
Badness: 0.017791
Line 632: Line 632:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.408
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.408


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 19, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19, 31 }}


Badness: 0.022870
Badness: 0.022870
Line 647: Line 647:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.499
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.499


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12ef, 19, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12ef, 19, 31 }}


Badness: 0.020488
Badness: 0.020488
Line 668: Line 668:
: eigenmonzo (unchanged-interval) basis: 2.11
: eigenmonzo (unchanged-interval) basis: 2.11


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12e, 19, 31f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12e, 19, 31f }}


Badness: 0.027666
Badness: 0.027666
Line 683: Line 683:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.414
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.414


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12e, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12e, 19 }}


Badness: 0.026836
Badness: 0.026836
Line 698: Line 698:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.497
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.497


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12e, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12e, 19 }}


Badness: 0.023540
Badness: 0.023540
Line 713: Line 713:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.415
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.415


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12e, 19g, 31fg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12e, 19g, 31fg }}


Badness: 0.026094
Badness: 0.026094
Line 728: Line 728:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.583
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.583


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12e, 19gh, 31fgh }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12e, 19gh, 31fgh }}


Badness: 0.023104
Badness: 0.023104
Line 751: Line 751:
* 11-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [682.502, 704.377]
* 11-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [682.502, 704.377]


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, 12, 19, 31e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 12, 19, 31e }}


Badness: 0.021423
Badness: 0.021423
Line 768: Line 768:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.146
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.146


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7df, 12f, 19, 31e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7df, 12f, 19, 31e }}


Badness: 0.021182
Badness: 0.021182
Line 783: Line 783:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.575
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.575


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 19, 31e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 19, 31e }}


Badness: 0.022980
Badness: 0.022980
Line 798: Line 798:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.706
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.706


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 19, 31e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 19, 31e }}


Badness: 0.020293
Badness: 0.020293
Line 813: Line 813:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.025
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.025


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7dfg, 12f, 19g }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7dfg, 12f, 19g }}


Badness: 0.020171
Badness: 0.020171
Line 828: Line 828:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.121
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.121


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7dfgh, 12f, 19gh }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7dfgh, 12f, 19gh }}


Badness: 0.018045
Badness: 0.018045
Line 843: Line 843:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.060
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.060


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, 12, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 12, 19 }}


Badness: 0.024763
Badness: 0.024763
Line 858: Line 858:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.858
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.858


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 19 }}


Badness: 0.025535
Badness: 0.025535
Line 873: Line 873:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.131
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.131


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 19 }}


Badness: 0.022302
Badness: 0.022302
Line 888: Line 888:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.044
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.044


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 19 }}


Badness: 0.020139
Badness: 0.020139
Line 903: Line 903:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.913
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.913


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 19 }}


Badness: 0.018168
Badness: 0.018168
Line 918: Line 918:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.750
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.750


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 19 }}


Badness: 0.017069
Badness: 0.017069
Line 933: Line 933:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.603
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.603


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 19 }}


Badness: 0.016129
Badness: 0.016129
Line 948: Line 948:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.696
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.696


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 19 }}


Badness: 0.015356
Badness: 0.015356
Line 963: Line 963:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.688
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.688


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 19 }}


Badness: 0.013906
Badness: 0.013906
Line 978: Line 978:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.676
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.676


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 19 }}


Badness: 0.013818
Badness: 0.013818
Line 993: Line 993:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.358
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.358


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7dg, 12, 19g }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7dg, 12, 19g }}


Badness: 0.022099
Badness: 0.022099
Line 1,008: Line 1,008:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.725
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.725


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7dgh, 12, 19gh }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7dgh, 12, 19gh }}


Badness: 0.019904
Badness: 0.019904
Line 1,023: Line 1,023:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.254
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.254


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, 12f, 19f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 12f, 19f }}


Badness: 0.024243
Badness: 0.024243
Line 1,038: Line 1,038:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.586
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.586


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7dg, 12f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7dg, 12f }}


Badness: 0.021400
Badness: 0.021400
Line 1,053: Line 1,053:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 698.118
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 698.118


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7dgh, 12f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7dgh, 12f }}


Badness: 0.018996
Badness: 0.018996
Line 1,070: Line 1,070:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 694.689
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 694.689


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, 12e, 19e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 12e, 19e }}


Badness: 0.031539
Badness: 0.031539
Line 1,085: Line 1,085:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 694.764
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 694.764


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, 12e, 19e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 12e, 19e }}


Badness: 0.026288
Badness: 0.026288
Line 1,104: Line 1,104:
* POTE: ~63/44 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 696.016
* POTE: ~63/44 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 696.016


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 26de, 38d, 50 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 26de, 38d, 50 }}


Badness: 0.038122
Badness: 0.038122
Line 1,119: Line 1,119:
* POTE: ~55/39 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 695.836
* POTE: ~55/39 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 695.836


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 26deff, 38df, 50 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 26deff, 38df, 50 }}


Badness: 0.028817
Badness: 0.028817
Line 1,134: Line 1,134:
* POTE: ~17/12 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 695.783
* POTE: ~17/12 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 695.783


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 38df, 50 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 38df, 50 }}


Badness: 0.022666
Badness: 0.022666
Line 1,149: Line 1,149:
* POTE: ~17/12 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 695.752
* POTE: ~17/12 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 695.752


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 26deff, 38df, 50 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 26deff, 38df, 50 }}


Badness: 0.017785
Badness: 0.017785
Line 1,166: Line 1,166:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/10 = 167.805
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/10 = 167.805


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, 36d, 43, 50, 93 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 36d, 43, 50, 93 }}


Badness: 0.050729
Badness: 0.050729
Line 1,181: Line 1,181:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/10 = 167.790
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/10 = 167.790


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, 43, 50, 93 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 43, 50, 93 }}


Badness: 0.035445
Badness: 0.035445
Line 1,196: Line 1,196:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/10 = 167.786
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/10 = 167.786


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7dg, 43, 50, 93 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7dg, 43, 50, 93 }}


Badness: 0.025221
Badness: 0.025221
Line 1,253: Line 1,253:
* 11-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [682.502, 701.955]
* 11-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [682.502, 701.955]


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 19, 26, 45, 71bc, 116bcde }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 19, 26, 45, 71bc, 116bcde }}


Badness: 0.033839
Badness: 0.033839
Line 1,272: Line 1,272:
* 13- and 15-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [682.502, 701.955]
* 13- and 15-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [682.502, 701.955]


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 19, 26, 45f, 71bcf, 116bcdef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 19, 26, 45f, 71bcf, 116bcdef }}


Badness: 0.022260
Badness: 0.022260
Line 1,310: Line 1,310:
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 692.042
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 692.042


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, 19d, 26, 59bcd, 85bccd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 19d, 26, 59bcd, 85bccd }}


; Music
; Music
Line 1,361: Line 1,361:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 703.254
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 703.254


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5, 12, 17c, 29cde }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 12, 17c, 29cde }}


Badness: 0.024180
Badness: 0.024180
Line 1,380: Line 1,380:
* 13- and 15-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [691.202, 715.587]
* 13- and 15-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [691.202, 715.587]


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence|12f, 17c, 29cdef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0|12f, 17c, 29cdef }}


Badness: 0.024108
Badness: 0.024108
Line 1,395: Line 1,395:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 704.905
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 704.905


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5, 12, 17c, 46cde }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 12, 17c, 46cde }}


Badness: 0.027295
Badness: 0.027295
Line 1,410: Line 1,410:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 698.776
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 698.776


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5e, 7, 12, 19d, 43de }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5e, 7, 12, 19d, 43de }}


Badness: 0.021978
Badness: 0.021978
Line 1,425: Line 1,425:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.762
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 695.762


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5ef, 7, 12, 19d, 31def }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5ef, 7, 12, 19d, 31def }}


Badness: 0.027039
Badness: 0.027039
Line 1,440: Line 1,440:
* POTE:  ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.115
* POTE:  ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.115


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5ef, 7, 12, 19d, 31def }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5ef, 7, 12, 19d, 31def }}


Badness: 0.024539
Badness: 0.024539
Line 1,455: Line 1,455:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.217
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.217


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5ef, 7, 12, 19d, 31def }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5ef, 7, 12, 19d, 31def }}


Badness: 0.020398
Badness: 0.020398
Line 1,470: Line 1,470:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 698.544
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 698.544


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5e, 7, 12f, 19df }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5e, 7, 12f, 19df }}


Badness: 0.018289
Badness: 0.018289
Line 1,485: Line 1,485:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 705.004
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 705.004


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5e, 12e, 17c, 46cd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5e, 12e, 17c, 46cd }}


Badness: 0.036562
Badness: 0.036562
Line 1,500: Line 1,500:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 705.496
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 705.496


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5e, 12e, 17c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5e, 12e, 17c }}


Badness: 0.027435
Badness: 0.027435
Line 1,515: Line 1,515:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 698.491
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 698.491


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5, 7, 12e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 7, 12e }}


Badness: 0.026141
Badness: 0.026141
Line 1,530: Line 1,530:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.743
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.743


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5, 7, 12ef, 19def }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 7, 12ef, 19def }}


Badness: 0.023300
Badness: 0.023300
Line 1,545: Line 1,545:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.978
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.978


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5, 7, 12ef, 19def }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 7, 12ef, 19def }}


Badness: 0.024535
Badness: 0.024535
Line 1,560: Line 1,560:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.068
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 697.068


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5, 7, 12ef, 19def }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 7, 12ef, 19def }}


Badness: 0.021098
Badness: 0.021098
Line 1,596: Line 1,596:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.615
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 696.615


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5, 7d, 12de }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 7d, 12de }}


Badness: 0.025167
Badness: 0.025167
Line 1,628: Line 1,628:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 705.096
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 705.096


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5de, 12de, 17c, 29c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5de, 12de, 17c, 29c }}


Badness: 0.063262
Badness: 0.063262
Line 1,643: Line 1,643:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 705.094
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 705.094


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5de, 12de, 17c, 29c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5de, 12de, 17c, 29c }}


Badness: 0.040324
Badness: 0.040324
Line 1,708: Line 1,708:
* 11-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~11/9 = [344.999, 350.978]
* 11-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~11/9 = [344.999, 350.978]


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 24, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 24, 31 }}


Badness: 0.026064
Badness: 0.026064
Line 1,725: Line 1,725:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 348.558
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 348.558


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 24, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 24, 31 }}


Badness: 0.023388
Badness: 0.023388
Line 1,742: Line 1,742:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 348.736
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 348.736


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 24, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 24, 31 }}


Badness: 0.020576
Badness: 0.020576
Line 1,759: Line 1,759:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 348.810
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 348.810


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 24, 31, 55 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 24, 31, 55 }}


Badness: 0.017302
Badness: 0.017302
Line 1,797: Line 1,797:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 350.565
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 350.565


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, 17c, 24 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 17c, 24 }}


Badness: 0.036207
Badness: 0.036207
Line 1,814: Line 1,814:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 350.745
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/9 = 350.745


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, 17c, 24, 41c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 17c, 24, 41c }}


Badness: 0.028738
Badness: 0.028738
Line 1,865: Line 1,865:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 633.073
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 633.073


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17c, 19, 36 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17c, 19, 36 }}


Badness: 0.040721
Badness: 0.040721
Line 1,880: Line 1,880:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 633.042
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 633.042


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17c, 19, 36, 91ceef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17c, 19, 36, 91ceef }}


Badness: 0.027304
Badness: 0.027304
Line 1,897: Line 1,897:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 633.061
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 633.061


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17c, 19e, 36e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17c, 19e, 36e }}


Badness: 0.041592
Badness: 0.041592
Line 1,912: Line 1,912:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 632.991
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 632.991


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17c, 19e, 36e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17c, 19e, 36e }}


Badness: 0.026922
Badness: 0.026922
Line 1,927: Line 1,927:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 631.370
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 631.370


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17cee, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17cee, 19 }}


Badness: 0.054829
Badness: 0.054829
Line 1,942: Line 1,942:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 631.221
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~10/7 = 631.221


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17cee, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17cee, 19 }}


Badness: 0.036144
Badness: 0.036144
Line 1,976: Line 1,976:
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/10 = 167.338
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/10 = 167.338


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 36, 43 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 36, 43 }}


Badness: 0.0576
Badness: 0.0576
Line 1,991: Line 1,991:
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/10 = 167.396
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/10 = 167.396


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 36, 43 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 36, 43 }}


Badness: 0.0368
Badness: 0.0368
Line 2,063: Line 2,063:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 425.957
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 425.957


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 14c, 17c, 31, 130bee, 169beee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14c, 17c, 31, 130bee, 169beee }}


Badness: 0.021636
Badness: 0.021636
Line 2,078: Line 2,078:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 425.550
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 425.550


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 14c, 17c, 31, 79cf }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14c, 17c, 31, 79cf }}


Badness: 0.025514
Badness: 0.025514
Line 2,093: Line 2,093:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 425.752
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 425.752


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 14cf, 17c, 31f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14cf, 17c, 31f }}


Badness: 0.026877
Badness: 0.026877
Line 2,108: Line 2,108:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 426.276
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 426.276


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 14cf, 31, 45ef, 76e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14cf, 31, 45ef, 76e }}


Badness: 0.024522
Badness: 0.024522
Line 2,123: Line 2,123:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 426.187
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 426.187


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 14cf, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14cf, 31 }}


Badness: 0.022573
Badness: 0.022573
Line 2,138: Line 2,138:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 426.225
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 426.225


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 14cf, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14cf, 31 }}


Badness: 0.018839
Badness: 0.018839
Line 2,155: Line 2,155:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 425.993
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~9/7 = 425.993


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 31, 107b, 138b, 169be, 200be }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 31, 107b, 138b, 169be, 200be }}


Badness: 0.056826
Badness: 0.056826
Line 2,195: Line 2,195:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~12/11 = 139.428
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~12/11 = 139.428


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17c, 26, 43 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17c, 26, 43 }}


Badness: 0.047914
Badness: 0.047914
Line 2,210: Line 2,210:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~13/12 = 139.387
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~13/12 = 139.387


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17c, 26, 43 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17c, 26, 43 }}


Badness: 0.029285
Badness: 0.029285
Line 2,225: Line 2,225:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~13/12 = 139.362
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~13/12 = 139.362


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17cg, 26, 43 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17cg, 26, 43 }}


Badness: 0.020878
Badness: 0.020878
Line 2,240: Line 2,240:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~13/12 = 139.313
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~13/12 = 139.313


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17cgh, 26, 43, 69 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17cgh, 26, 43, 69 }}


Badness: 0.018229
Badness: 0.018229
Line 2,276: Line 2,276:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/5 = 580.647
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/5 = 580.647


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 29cde, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 29cde, 31 }}


Badness: 0.042869
Badness: 0.042869
Line 2,330: Line 2,330:
* 11-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [682.458, 701.955]
* 11-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [682.458, 701.955]


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 26 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 26 }}


Badness: 0.023124
Badness: 0.023124
Line 2,349: Line 2,349:
* 13- and 15-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [682.458, 701.955]
* 13- and 15-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~3/2 = [682.458, 701.955]


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 14cf, 26 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 14cf, 26 }}


Badness: 0.021565
Badness: 0.021565
Line 2,364: Line 2,364:
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 692.487 (~21/20 = 92.487)
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 692.487 (~21/20 = 92.487)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 14cf, 26 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 14cf, 26 }}


Badness: 0.018358
Badness: 0.018358
Line 2,379: Line 2,379:
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 692.299 (~21/20 = 92.299)
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 692.299 (~21/20 = 92.299)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 14cf, 26 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 14cf, 26 }}


Badness: 0.015118
Badness: 0.015118
Line 2,394: Line 2,394:
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 694.121 (~21/20 = 94.121)
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 694.121 (~21/20 = 94.121)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 10cdeef, 12f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 10cdeef, 12f }}


Badness: 0.026542
Badness: 0.026542
Line 2,409: Line 2,409:
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 690.548 (~21/20 = 90.548)
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 690.548 (~21/20 = 90.548)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12e, 14c, 26e, 40cee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12e, 14c, 26e, 40cee }}


Badness: 0.038577
Badness: 0.038577
Line 2,424: Line 2,424:
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 699.001 (~21/20 = 99.001)
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~3/2 = 699.001 (~21/20 = 99.001)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 10cd, 12 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 10cd, 12 }}


Badness: 0.043062
Badness: 0.043062
Line 2,445: Line 2,445:
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.530 (~33/32 = 47.470)
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.530 (~33/32 = 47.470)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24d, 26, 50d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 24d, 26, 50d }}


Badness: 0.070689
Badness: 0.070689
Line 2,460: Line 2,460:
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.532 (~33/32 = 47.468)
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.532 (~33/32 = 47.468)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24d, 26, 50d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 24d, 26, 50d }}


Badness: 0.040047
Badness: 0.040047
Line 2,475: Line 2,475:
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.656 (~34/33 = 47.344)
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.656 (~34/33 = 47.344)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24d, 26 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 24d, 26 }}


Badness: 0.029499
Badness: 0.029499
Line 2,490: Line 2,490:
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.638 (~34/33 = 47.362)
* POTE: ~7/5 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.638 (~34/33 = 47.362)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24d, 26 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 24d, 26 }}


Badness: 0.023133
Badness: 0.023133
Line 2,528: Line 2,528:
* POTE: ~99/70 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.093 (~36/35 = 47.907)
* POTE: ~99/70 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.093 (~36/35 = 47.907)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24, 26, 50 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 24, 26, 50 }}


Badness: 0.052099
Badness: 0.052099
Line 2,543: Line 2,543:
* POTE: ~99/70 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.150 (~36/35 = 47.850)
* POTE: ~99/70 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.150 (~36/35 = 47.850)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24, 26, 50 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 24, 26, 50 }}


Badness: 0.031039
Badness: 0.031039
Line 2,558: Line 2,558:
* POTE: ~17/12 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.158 (~36/35 = 47.842)
* POTE: ~17/12 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.158 (~36/35 = 47.842)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24, 26, 50 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 24, 26, 50 }}


Badness: 0.021260
Badness: 0.021260
Line 2,573: Line 2,573:
* POTE: ~17/12 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.120 (~36/35 = 47.880)
* POTE: ~17/12 = 600.000, ~11/8 = 552.120 (~36/35 = 47.880)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24, 26, 50 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 24, 26, 50 }}


Badness: 0.016548
Badness: 0.016548
Line 2,609: Line 2,609:
* POTE: ~363/256 = 600.000, ~77/64 = 324.238 (~7/6 = 275.762)
* POTE: ~363/256 = 600.000, ~77/64 = 324.238 (~7/6 = 275.762)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 26, 48c, 74 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 26, 48c, 74 }}


Badness: 0.101499
Badness: 0.101499
Line 2,624: Line 2,624:
* POTE: ~55/39 = 600.000, ~77/64 = 324.226 (~7/6 = 275.774)
* POTE: ~55/39 = 600.000, ~77/64 = 324.226 (~7/6 = 275.774)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 26, 48c, 74 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 26, 48c, 74 }}


Badness: 0.053482
Badness: 0.053482
Line 2,662: Line 2,662:
* POTE: ~8/7 = 240.000, ~3/2 = 696.536 (~56/55 = 23.464)
* POTE: ~8/7 = 240.000, ~3/2 = 696.536 (~56/55 = 23.464)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5, 45, 50 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 45, 50 }}


Badness: 0.070378
Badness: 0.070378
Line 2,677: Line 2,677:
* POTE: ~8/7 = 240.000, ~3/2 = 696.162 (~91/90 = 23.838)
* POTE: ~8/7 = 240.000, ~3/2 = 696.162 (~91/90 = 23.838)


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5, 45f, 50 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 45f, 50 }}


Badness: 0.048829
Badness: 0.048829
Line 2,733: Line 2,733:
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 693.087
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 693.087


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 12, 19, 26, 45f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 12, 19, 26, 45f }}


Badness: 0.0141
Badness: 0.0141
Line 2,767: Line 2,767:
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 690.183
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~3/2 = 690.183


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 19eff, 26eff, 33ceeff, 40ceeff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 19eff, 26eff, 33ceeff, 40ceeff }}


Badness: 0.0353
Badness: 0.0353
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/Meantone_family"