Ringer scale: Difference between revisions

Godtone (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


== Perfect ringer scales ==
== Perfect ringer scales ==
A perfect ringer ''n'' scale is one that by some val can map the first ''n'' odd harmonics to distinct numbers of steps up to [[octave equivalence]]. It is conjectured that these are the only perfect ringer scales:
A perfect ringer ''n'' scale is one that by some val can map the first ''n'' odd harmonics to distinct numbers of steps up to [[octave equivalence]]. These are the only perfect ringer scales:


'''Ringer 1:''' 1:2
'''Ringer 1:''' 1:2
Line 21: Line 21:


Notice how all of these do not skip any harmonics while representing the harmonic series ''completely'' up to some [[odd-limit]].
Notice how all of these do not skip any harmonics while representing the harmonic series ''completely'' up to some [[odd-limit]].
Such a scale will either contain a pair of intervals (n+2):n and [(3/2)n+3]:[(3/2)n] if ''n'' is even so long as (3/2)n+3 ≤ 2n and therefore n ≥ 6, or (n+3):(n+1) and [(3/2)(n+1)+3]:[(3/2)(n+1)] if ''n'' is odd so long as (3/2)(n+1)+3 = (3/2)(n+3) ≤ 2n and therefore n ≥ 9. Between these two conditions, it is apparent that ''n'' = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 create the only constant structures representing the entire harmonic series from ''n'' to ''2n''.


Also note that there is a "Perfect Pseudoringer 9" if we allow a pair of harmonics to be swapped/out of order in order to preserve the constant structure property. It is not known how many "Perfect Pseudoringers" there are.
Also note that there is a "Perfect Pseudoringer 9" if we allow a pair of harmonics to be swapped/out of order in order to preserve the constant structure property. It is not known how many "Perfect Pseudoringers" there are.