Xenharmonic Wiki:Cross-platform dialogue: Difference between revisions

::::: Hmm... maybe it's a bad example for me because I think tempering 128/125 is unfeasible (maybe [[27edo]] does it well but that uses [[delta-rational chord]]s to justify itself so it's not really the thing temperaments were designed for because the target isn't a fixed point) but I will follow the spirit of the logic of the example. The issue seems to be rather that CTE isn't designed to handle the case where extra generators are independent of the commas tempered if you are valuing p/q over pq (because CTE choosing pure generators makes perfect sense if you want to weight them equally and in this sense it's the logical constraining of [[TE]] which assumes the same). But POTE certainly doesn't seem to be the right fix to prioritising p/q over pq. Rather it seems like (at least in this case) what's wanted is a metric that respects tendency (a desire I've voiced before actually). For example it's noted [[Constrained_tuning#CTE_tuning_vs_CTWE_tuning|here]] that "POTE tuning works as a quick approximation to CTWE" (AKA KE tuning), so maybe CTWE / KE tuning is desired? --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 18:23, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

=== Mike's Response to All This ===