Talk:256/255: Difference between revisions

Line 64:

:::: Apologies, I didn't realize someone had changed the Horcrux names already so what I said is not fully true. I also want to make clear that I do appreciate your consideration. I think much of this would go more smoothly if there was a more official/standard process for names and the occasional renames. I am working on that right now. I would be grateful if anyone wants to improve what I will add. Ideally though, if it is not a convention that will likely be taken as uncontroversial, then discuss it first in the corresponding talk page. Kind regards, --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 18:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

::::: While it is not quite finished yet (EG it is pending contribution and opinions of more users plus I have yet to reread it in its entirety one last time and see if anything else comes to mind in the way of missing points or rewordings for clarity), please take a look at what I have so far here: [[Temperament naming#Temperament/comma (re)naming conventions]]. I've vetted a simplified version of it with FloraC and Fredg999. Note also that almost every point for renaming applies to the situation for [[256/255]]; it got me thinking about that there ought to be a set of conventions by which renames can be judged as not inherently controversial, especially if there are many points in favour of them. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 19:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:01, 9 January 2024 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 2,289 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:16, 9 January 2024 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 2,289 edits with regards to conventions for renaming Newer edit →
Line 64:		Line 64:

	:::: Apologies, I didn't realize someone had changed the Horcrux names already so what I said is not fully true. I also want to make clear that I do appreciate your consideration. I think much of this would go more smoothly if there was a more official/standard process for names and the occasional renames. I am working on that right now. I would be grateful if anyone wants to improve what I will add. Ideally though, if it is not a convention that will likely be taken as uncontroversial, then discuss it first in the corresponding talk page. Kind regards, --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 18:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)		:::: Apologies, I didn't realize someone had changed the Horcrux names already so what I said is not fully true. I also want to make clear that I do appreciate your consideration. I think much of this would go more smoothly if there was a more official/standard process for names and the occasional renames. I am working on that right now. I would be grateful if anyone wants to improve what I will add. Ideally though, if it is not a convention that will likely be taken as uncontroversial, then discuss it first in the corresponding talk page. Kind regards, --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 18:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

			::::: While it is not quite finished yet (EG it is pending contribution and opinions of more users plus I have yet to reread it in its entirety one last time and see if anything else comes to mind in the way of missing points or rewordings for clarity), please take a look at what I have so far here: [[Temperament naming#Temperament/comma (re)naming conventions]]. I've vetted a simplified version of it with FloraC and Fredg999. Note also that almost every point for renaming applies to the situation for [[256/255]]; it got me thinking about that there ought to be a set of conventions by which renames can be judged as not inherently controversial, especially if there are many points in favour of them. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 19:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)