Xenllium
Joined 15 November 2018
please look at Talk:136/135 |
|||
| Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
::: I replied on the talk page, but in regards to the alternative name "diasemitonisma", it strikes me as a bit cumbersome to describe the 2.3.5.17[12&22] temperament as "diasemitonic semitonic". It's not a bad name per se but what's wrong with the name change proposal? Charisma and Charismic already need renaming anyways and there are two fairly obvious options that seem fine and clearly related for what to change them to. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 16:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC) | ::: I replied on the talk page, but in regards to the alternative name "diasemitonisma", it strikes me as a bit cumbersome to describe the 2.3.5.17[12&22] temperament as "diasemitonic semitonic". It's not a bad name per se but what's wrong with the name change proposal? Charisma and Charismic already need renaming anyways and there are two fairly obvious options that seem fine and clearly related for what to change them to. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 16:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
== Hi! Do you have any ideas for a slight/mild rename of 136/135? == | |||
Please take a look at [[Talk:136/135]]. A name that is very similar/in the same vein would work great; the issue is just that "diatonismic" implies that "diatonic" refers to a rank 3 temperament. Warm regards, --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 22:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC) | |||