Talk:256/255: Difference between revisions
new name |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
What about "charisma" from "char"+"isma"? Suggested by Starshine on XA Discord. In programming, a char is, in modern usage, practically almost always an 8-bit byte. Therefore 2^8 = 256 is the number of values it can hold and 255 is the maximum (unsigned) integer value, hence 256/255. "bytisma" was suggested by Fumica to avoid naming conflict with the temperament of the same name "Charisma" in the magic family, which has an extension named "Charismic". However, the name "Charisma" for a temperament defies the intuitive implicit rule that something ending in "-isma" must be a comma and they seem to me to be very low-accuracy temperaments anyways so seem not to be of note/significance as ''temperaments'' as opposed to as scale blueprint patterns (as exotemperaments do have legitimate serious uses, just not insomuch for convincing harmony, but rather as interesting mappings). Therefore we also propose renaming "Charisma" and "Charismic" to something else. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 15:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC) | What about "charisma" from "char"+"isma"? Suggested by Starshine on XA Discord. In programming, a char is, in modern usage, practically almost always an 8-bit byte. Therefore 2^8 = 256 is the number of values it can hold and 255 is the maximum (unsigned) integer value, hence 256/255. "bytisma" was suggested by Fumica to avoid naming conflict with the temperament of the same name "Charisma" in the magic family, which has an extension named "Charismic". However, the name "Charisma" for a temperament defies the intuitive implicit rule that something ending in "-isma" must be a comma and they seem to me to be very low-accuracy temperaments anyways so seem not to be of note/significance as ''temperaments'' as opposed to as scale blueprint patterns (as exotemperaments do have legitimate serious uses, just not insomuch for convincing harmony, but rather as interesting mappings). Therefore we also propose renaming "Charisma" and "Charismic" to something else. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 15:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
: I want to add that "diasemisma" is also, IMO, a slightly confusing name as [[289/288]] which also seems to have claim to the same name reasoning is called the "semitonisma", except in the case of [[289/288]] the corresponding whole tone is [[9/8]] but here it is [[17/15]]. Also, associating the terms "charisma" and "charismic" with Harry Potter seems very unnecessary to me. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 22:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:16, 26 December 2023
comma name proposal: "charisma"
What about "charisma" from "char"+"isma"? Suggested by Starshine on XA Discord. In programming, a char is, in modern usage, practically almost always an 8-bit byte. Therefore 2^8 = 256 is the number of values it can hold and 255 is the maximum (unsigned) integer value, hence 256/255. "bytisma" was suggested by Fumica to avoid naming conflict with the temperament of the same name "Charisma" in the magic family, which has an extension named "Charismic". However, the name "Charisma" for a temperament defies the intuitive implicit rule that something ending in "-isma" must be a comma and they seem to me to be very low-accuracy temperaments anyways so seem not to be of note/significance as temperaments as opposed to as scale blueprint patterns (as exotemperaments do have legitimate serious uses, just not insomuch for convincing harmony, but rather as interesting mappings). Therefore we also propose renaming "Charisma" and "Charismic" to something else. --Godtone (talk) 15:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- I want to add that "diasemisma" is also, IMO, a slightly confusing name as 289/288 which also seems to have claim to the same name reasoning is called the "semitonisma", except in the case of 289/288 the corresponding whole tone is 9/8 but here it is 17/15. Also, associating the terms "charisma" and "charismic" with Harry Potter seems very unnecessary to me. --Godtone (talk) 22:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)