Tp tuning: Difference between revisions
Style. Contents still need to be reviewed |
TE -> Tp in the intro |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning}} | |||
'''T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning''' is a generalization of [[TOP tuning|TOP]] and [[Tenney-Euclidean tuning|TE]] tuning. (In this article ''p'' denotes a parameter, ''p'' ≥ 1; it does not denote a prime.) | '''T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning''' is a generalization of [[TOP tuning|TOP]] and [[Tenney-Euclidean tuning|TE]] tuning. (In this article ''p'' denotes a parameter, ''p'' ≥ 1; it does not denote a prime.) | ||
For a subgroup temperament over a general JI subgroup, and for a given choice of ''p'' (most commonly ''p'' = 2), there are two notions of T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning: | For a subgroup temperament over a general [[JI subgroup]], and for a given choice of ''p'' (most commonly ''p'' = 2), there are two notions of T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning: | ||
* The first is called '''inharmonic | * The first is called '''inharmonic T<sub>''p''</sub>''', because the basis entries are treated as if they were primes, reminiscent of some inharmonic timbres. Inharmonic T<sub>''p''</sub> depends on the basis used for the subgroup. In non-octave temperaments, inharmonic T<sub>''p''</sub> could be used when optimizing a specific voicing of a tempered JI chord. For example in 3/2.7/4.5/2 semiwolf temperament which tempers out 245/243, the 3/2.7/4.5/2 inharmonic T<sub>''p''</sub> optimizes the 4:6:7:10 chord. | ||
* The second is called '''subgroup | * The second is called '''subgroup T<sub>''p''</sub>''', because it treats the temperament as a restriction of a full prime-limit temperament to a subgroup of the prime-limit. Subgroup T<sub>''p''</sub> does not depend on the basis used for the subgroup, and as stated, extends naturally to the T<sub>''p''</sub> tuning of the full prime-limit temperament. | ||
The two notions agree exactly when the temperament is defined on a JI subgroup with a basis consisting of rationally independent (i.e. pairwise coprime) members. That is, the subgroup has a basis where no two elements share a prime factor (examples: 2.3.5 and 2.9.5; nonexample: 2.9.5.21). | The two notions agree exactly when the temperament is defined on a JI subgroup with a basis consisting of rationally independent (i.e. pairwise coprime) members. That is, the subgroup has a basis where no two elements share a prime factor (examples: 2.3.5 and 2.9.5; nonexample: 2.9.5.21). |