Sengic family: Difference between revisions

Update keys
+badnesses; review optimal ET sequences
Line 14: Line 14:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.154, ~15/14 = 129.824
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.154, ~15/14 = 129.824


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 9, 10, 18, 19, 27, 46 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 9, 10, 17c, 19, 27, 46 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.320 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 0.320 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 29: Line 29:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 705.518, ~15/14 = 130.039
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 705.518, ~15/14 = 130.039


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 10, 17c, 19e, 27e, 29, 46 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 10, 17c, 19e, 27e, 46, 102, 148 }}
 
[[Badness]]: 1.32 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


[[Projection pair]]s: ~5 = 2725888/531441, ~7 = 15488/2187 to 2.3.11
[[Projection pair]]s: ~5 = 2725888/531441, ~7 = 15488/2187 to 2.3.11
Line 42: Line 44:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 705.113, ~14/13 = 129.673
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 705.113, ~14/13 = 129.673


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 10, 17c, 19e, 27e, 29, 46 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 10, 17c, 19e, 27e, 29, 46, 102, 148f }}
 
Badness: 0.977 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


Projection pairs: ~5 = 2725888/531441, ~7 = 15488/2187, ~13 = 352/27 to 2.3.11
Projection pairs: ~5 = 2725888/531441, ~7 = 15488/2187, ~13 = 352/27 to 2.3.11
Line 55: Line 59:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 705.147, ~14/13 = 129.700
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 705.147, ~14/13 = 129.700


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 10, 17cg, 19eg, 27eg, 29g, 46 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 10, 17cg, 19eg, 27eg, 29g, 46, 102, 148f }}
 
Badness: 0.830 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


Projection pairs: ~5 = 2725888/531441, ~7 = 15488/2187, ~13 = 352/27, ~17 = 340736/19683 to 2.3.11
Projection pairs: ~5 = 2725888/531441, ~7 = 15488/2187, ~13 = 352/27, ~17 = 340736/19683 to 2.3.11