Category talk:Equivalence interval: Difference between revisions
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: I’m happy to go with whatever the consensus is, though, because I don’t really have a strong opinion on what counts as an “equivalence interval” and what doesn’t. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 02:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC) | : I’m happy to go with whatever the consensus is, though, because I don’t really have a strong opinion on what counts as an “equivalence interval” and what doesn’t. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 02:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
: I was wondering the same. While I've seen many scales with diverse ''intervals of repetition'', including equal divisions of various just intervals, I have seen very little accounts of people stating they actually hear anything else than octaves, and possibly tritaves (although even a stack of two tritaves is a stretch in my opinion). Scales like [[10ed5]] and [[19ed11]] may well feature a just interval different from the octave, that doesn't promote it automatically to the rank of "equivalence interval". | : I was wondering the same. While I've seen many scales with diverse ''intervals of repetition'', including equal divisions of various just intervals, I have seen very little accounts of people stating they actually hear anything else than octaves, and possibly tritaves (although even a stack of two tritaves is a stretch in my opinion). Scales like [[10ed5]] and [[19ed11]] may well feature a just interval different from the octave, that doesn't promote it automatically to the rank of "equivalence interval". | ||
: To be honest, I don't think this category is even necessary or relevant anyway; of course the page about [[equave]]s is needed, and relevant pages can link to each other, but having a category for that seems unjustified, especially since the boundaries for that category will most likely remain fuzzy forever. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC) | :: To be honest, I don't think this category is even necessary or relevant anyway; of course the page about [[equave]]s is needed, and relevant pages can link to each other, but having a category for that seems unjustified, especially since the boundaries for that category will most likely remain fuzzy forever. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove it from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC) | |||