Talk:Marvel temperaments: Difference between revisions

Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Fredg999 (talk | contribs)
Line 22: Line 22:


::: I can see that if we added a statement to the Negri page that ''explicitly'' explains things — and explains fully — how negripent and negrisept are out-of-use historical names for 5-limit and 7-limit negri, then I think this could be a best-of-both-worlds solution. Do you agree, or have I misunderstood anything? Thank you for this opportunity to further improve. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
::: I can see that if we added a statement to the Negri page that ''explicitly'' explains things — and explains fully — how negripent and negrisept are out-of-use historical names for 5-limit and 7-limit negri, then I think this could be a best-of-both-worlds solution. Do you agree, or have I misunderstood anything? Thank you for this opportunity to further improve. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
:::: I think the wiki should be uniform in its usage (or "not-usage") of the -pent and -sept suffixes. If negripent and negrisept are considered out of use, then should sensipent and sensisept also be considered out of use, and so on?
:::: Also, the redirects should point to the page about the topic. The out-of-use historical names can be mentioned in a "history" section at the top of the page, just below the lead section, but the redirects do not need to point to the section, because people looking for "negripent" are most likely looking to learn about the temperament, not about the terminology changes. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 18:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Return to "Marvel temperaments" page.