Quintaleap family: Difference between revisions

Xenllium (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lériendil (talk | contribs)
Line 17: Line 17:


=== Subgroup temperament ===
=== Subgroup temperament ===
{{see also| No-sevens subgroup temperaments #Quintaleap }}


The quintaleap temperament works well for the 2.3.5.17.19 subgroup, tempering out 256/255 (equating 16/15 with 17/16), 361/360 (equating 19/18 with 20/19), and 4624/4617. An obvious 17-limit interpretation of the generator is ~[[18/17]], equating three 18/17s with [[19/16]], five 18/17s with [[4/3]], and sixteen 18/17s with [[5/2]].
The quintaleap temperament works well for the 2.3.5.17.19 subgroup, tempering out 256/255 (equating 16/15 with 17/16), 361/360 (equating 19/18 with 20/19), and 4624/4617. An obvious 17-limit interpretation of the generator is ~[[18/17]], equating three 18/17s with [[19/16]], five 18/17s with [[4/3]], and sixteen 18/17s with [[5/2]].


==== 2.3.5.17 ====
Subgroup: 2.3.5.17
[[Comma list]]: 256/255, 1419857/1417176
[[Gencom]]: [2 18/17; 256/255 1419857/1417176]
[[Gencom|Gencom mapping]]: [{{val| 1 2 1 0 0 0 5 }}, {{val| 0 -5 16 0 0 0 -11 }}]
[[Mapping|Sval mapping]]: [{{val| 1 2 1 5 }}, {{val| 0 -5 16 -11 }}]
[[Tp tuning|POL2 generator]]: ~18/17 = 99.272
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 109, 121, 133 }}
[[Tp tuning #T2 tuning|RMS error]]: 0.3051 cents
==== 2.3.5.17.19 ====
Subgroup: 2.3.5.17.19
Subgroup: 2.3.5.17.19


Comma list: 256/255, 361/360, 4624/4617
[[Comma list]]: 256/255, 361/360, 4624/4617
 
[[Gencom]]: [2 18/17; 256/255 361/360 4624/4617]
 
[[Gencom|Gencom mapping]]: [{{val| 1 2 1 0 0 0 5 4 }}, {{val| 0 -5 16 0 0 0 -11 3 }}]


Sval mapping: [{{val| 1 2 1 5 4 }}, {{val| 0 -5 16 -11 3 }}]
[[Mapping|Sval mapping]]: [{{val| 1 2 1 5 4 }}, {{val| 0 -5 16 -11 3 }}]


Gencom: [2 18/17; 256/255 361/360 4624/4617]
[[Tp tuning|POL2 generator]]: ~18/17 = 99.276


POTE generator: ~18/17 = 99.276
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 109, 121, 133 }}


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 109, 121, 133 }}
[[Tp tuning #T2 tuning|RMS error]]: 0.3427 cents


Badness: 0.014623
Badness: 0.014623