Talk:IFDO: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
re |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
:::::: c) I also suggest that the ADO and IDO infoboxes be changed to the ODO and UDO infoboxes. | :::::: c) I also suggest that the ADO and IDO infoboxes be changed to the ODO and UDO infoboxes. | ||
:::::: I have not taken those actions yet, however, because I did not create all these pages myself, and I want to respect CompactStar's authorship and give them a chance to weigh in on the matter. I'm sorry this is a lot of changes and suggested further changes, but I was just not available to spend my time and energy on this issue while it was beginning to balloon out of control these past couple months. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 18:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC) | :::::: I have not taken those actions yet, however, because I did not create all these pages myself, and I want to respect CompactStar's authorship and give them a chance to weigh in on the matter. I'm sorry this is a lot of changes and suggested further changes, but I was just not available to spend my time and energy on this issue while it was beginning to balloon out of control these past couple months. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 18:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::::: I strongly oppose moving ado to odo and ido to udo. If anything, efdo and eldo would be acceptable. As I said in ''Talk:Arithmetic tuning'', OD and UD shouldn't be used to identify tuning systems. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 05:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC) | |||