Talk:Arithmetic tuning: Difference between revisions
Created page with "== Proposed changes == First, I propose freeing the word ''arithmetic'' in the sense of arithmetic-like, and thereby changing: * ''Arithmetic tuning'' to ''arithmetic-like tu..." |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC) | [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
: The reason why "AFS" is used instead of "EFS" is because an [[Wikipedia:Arithmetic sequence|arithmetic sequence]] is an established mathematical concept with a logical name, whereas the name "equal sequence" is neither logical nor established. I have edited the article to clarify this. | |||
: For an individual, standardization to something such as exclusively using EDs may be fine, but Paul, Billy, and I designed this system to work for the wider community, a collection of individuals with diverse wants and needs, and I think it's clear that for some people in some circumstances, conceptualizing tunings as sequences will be more intuitive or appropriate. | |||
: EFD was never "reserved" for irrational. It should support either irrational or rational. If that’s not clear in an article, please feel free to correct it or point it out to me. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 16:34, 3 March 2023 (UTC) | |||