1225/1224: Difference between revisions

m Temperaments: note on the ranks
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 42: Line 42:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 702.0440, ~5/4 = 386.1228, ~7/4 = 968.5468, ~11/8 = 551.3179, ~13/8 = 840.5277
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 702.0440, ~5/4 = 386.1228, ~7/4 = 968.5468, ~11/8 = 551.3179, ~13/8 = 840.5277


{{Val list|legend=1| 19eg, 22, 26, 27eg, 31, 41g, 45efg, 46, 68, 72, 103, 121, 140, 171, 190g, 212g, 217, 224, 270, 311, 414, 441, 460, 581, 995, 1265, 1648cd, 1846g, 1918d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19eg, 22, 26, 27eg, 31, 41g, 45efg, 46, 68, 72, 103, 121, 140, 171, 190g, 212g, 217, 224, 270, 311, 414, 441, 460, 581, 995, 1265, 1648cd, 1846g, 1918d }}


=== Noellic ===
=== Noellic ===
Line 57: Line 57:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 702.0440, ~5/4 = 386.1228, ~7/4 = 968.5468
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 702.0440, ~5/4 = 386.1228, ~7/4 = 968.5468


{{Val list|legend=1| 19g, 22, 27g, 31, 41g, 46, 53, 68, 72, 99, 171, 581, 653, 752, 824, 995, 1576, 1747, 1918d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19g, 22, 27g, 31, 41g, 46, 53, 68, 72, 99, 171, 581, 653, 752, 824, 995, 1576, 1747, 1918d }}


== Etymology ==
== Etymology ==