Talk:Mavila: Difference between revisions

Fredg999 (talk | contribs)
Added header + reply
A (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


: I would suggest rephrasing this sentence instead of removing it completely. For example, we could say that this temperament was ''inspired'' by the pelog scale — implying that the temperament does not attempt in any way to model the traditional pelog scale —, although I'd have to double-check to see if that's an accurate description of this temperament's history. Removing this sentence would only make it harder for readers to understand that, while the mathematical object is universal, its use in music has a cultural background that deserves to be presented clearly. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
: I would suggest rephrasing this sentence instead of removing it completely. For example, we could say that this temperament was ''inspired'' by the pelog scale — implying that the temperament does not attempt in any way to model the traditional pelog scale —, although I'd have to double-check to see if that's an accurate description of this temperament's history. Removing this sentence would only make it harder for readers to understand that, while the mathematical object is universal, its use in music has a cultural background that deserves to be presented clearly. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
:: That sounds good. I'm cool with a rephrase that makes it clear that the relationship is a one-way street. If possible, it would be good to clarify which region of Indonesia (Java, Bali, etc.) since I believe the tunings are pretty distinct despite the reuse of the terms slendro and pelog. [[User:A|A]] ([[User talk:A|talk]]) 06:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Return to "Mavila" page.