Complexity: Difference between revisions

Rework. This word can't be assumed to be said wrt temperaments
Cleanup and clarify some of the complexity measures
Line 6: Line 6:
Being a characteristic of [[temperament]]s, complexity can be used to evaluate and compare them. Generally speaking, if a temperament has high complexity, that means that interesting pitches (e.g. ones [[consonant]] with each other) are many [[generator]]s apart, so useful scales tend to have many notes. If a temperament has low complexity, fewer generators are required, and scales with fewer notes are more likely to be useful.
Being a characteristic of [[temperament]]s, complexity can be used to evaluate and compare them. Generally speaking, if a temperament has high complexity, that means that interesting pitches (e.g. ones [[consonant]] with each other) are many [[generator]]s apart, so useful scales tend to have many notes. If a temperament has low complexity, fewer generators are required, and scales with fewer notes are more likely to be useful.


Complexity and [[error]] are both usually treated as undesirable characteristics, but there is a trade-off between them in that very low complexity temperaments (e.g. small [[EDO]]s) cannot have low error, and very low error temperaments (e.g. [[microtemperament]]s or [[JI]] itself) cannot have low complexity. [[Badness]] is a way to combine complexity and error such that a search for low-badness temperaments yields results with a particularly good trade-off between complexity and error.
Complexity and [[error]] are both usually treated as undesirable characteristics, but there is a trade-off between them in that very low complexity temperaments (e.g. small [[edo]]s) cannot have low error, and very low error temperaments (e.g. [[microtemperament]]s or [[JI]] itself) cannot have low complexity. [[Badness]] is a way to combine complexity and error such that a search for low-badness temperaments yields results with a particularly good trade-off between complexity and error.


== Complexity of an interval in a temperament ==
== Complexity of an interval in a temperament ==
Besides saying that a temperament has a high or low complexity, we also speak of the '''complexity of an interval''' in a temperament. If an interval has a low complexity in a certain temperament, that means it can be reached in only a few [[generators]], so it is likely to appear frequently in scales of that temperament. For example, in [[meantone]] temperament, the generator represents 3/2, so clearly 3/2 has a very low complexity, since it can be reached in only one generator. In contrast, 45/32 can only be reached in 6 generators so it has a higher complexity and will tend to appear much less frequently in meantone scales.
Besides saying that a temperament has a high or low complexity, we also speak of the ''complexity of an interval'' in a temperament. If an interval has a low complexity in a certain temperament, that means it can be reached in only a few [[generator]]s, so it is likely to appear frequently in scales of that temperament. For example, in [[meantone]] temperament, the generator represents 3/2, so clearly 3/2 has a very low complexity, since it can be reached in only one generator. In contrast, 45/32 can only be reached in 6 generators so it has a higher complexity and will tend to appear much less frequently in meantone scales.


The '''complexity of a chord''' likewise refers to the number of generator steps required to generate all the pitches of the chord.
The ''complexity of a chord'' likewise refers to the number of generator steps required to generate all the pitches of the chord.


Note that the concept of complexity applies not only to [[rank-2 temperaments]], but temperaments of any rank. For rank >2 temperaments, the lattice is a higher-dimensional space so there could be different ways of measuring the area/volume/etc. that a chord takes up.
Note that the concept of complexity applies not only to [[rank-2 temperament]]s, but temperaments of any rank. For higher-rank temperaments, the lattice is a higher-dimensional space, so there could be different ways of measuring the area/volume/etc. that a chord takes up.


== Complexity measures ==
== Complexity measures ==
Some specific, mathematically rigorous definitions of "complexity" are...
Some specific, mathematically rigorous definitions of "complexity" are…


* [[Graham complexity]]
* [[Graham complexity]] (chord complexity)
* [[Generator complexity]]
* [[Generator complexity]] (temperament complexity)
* [[Tenney-Euclidean_temperament_measures#TE complexity|TE complexity]]
* [[Tenney-Euclidean temperament_measures #TE complexity|TE complexity]] (temperament complexity)
* [[Tenney-Euclidean_metrics#Temperamental complexity|Temperamental complexity]]
* Various [[height]] functions (interval complexity in JI)
* [[Benedetti height]]</li></ul>
* [[Tenney-Euclidean_metrics #Temperamental complexity|Interval temperamental complexity]] (interval complexity in temperaments)


[[Category:Complexity| ]] <!-- main article -->
[[Category:Complexity| ]] <!-- main article -->
[[Category:Theory]]
[[Category:Overview]]