Complexity: Difference between revisions
Rework. This word can't be assumed to be said wrt temperaments |
Cleanup and clarify some of the complexity measures |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Being a characteristic of [[temperament]]s, complexity can be used to evaluate and compare them. Generally speaking, if a temperament has high complexity, that means that interesting pitches (e.g. ones [[consonant]] with each other) are many [[generator]]s apart, so useful scales tend to have many notes. If a temperament has low complexity, fewer generators are required, and scales with fewer notes are more likely to be useful. | Being a characteristic of [[temperament]]s, complexity can be used to evaluate and compare them. Generally speaking, if a temperament has high complexity, that means that interesting pitches (e.g. ones [[consonant]] with each other) are many [[generator]]s apart, so useful scales tend to have many notes. If a temperament has low complexity, fewer generators are required, and scales with fewer notes are more likely to be useful. | ||
Complexity and [[error]] are both usually treated as undesirable characteristics, but there is a trade-off between them in that very low complexity temperaments (e.g. small [[ | Complexity and [[error]] are both usually treated as undesirable characteristics, but there is a trade-off between them in that very low complexity temperaments (e.g. small [[edo]]s) cannot have low error, and very low error temperaments (e.g. [[microtemperament]]s or [[JI]] itself) cannot have low complexity. [[Badness]] is a way to combine complexity and error such that a search for low-badness temperaments yields results with a particularly good trade-off between complexity and error. | ||
== Complexity of an interval in a temperament == | == Complexity of an interval in a temperament == | ||
Besides saying that a temperament has a high or low complexity, we also speak of the | Besides saying that a temperament has a high or low complexity, we also speak of the ''complexity of an interval'' in a temperament. If an interval has a low complexity in a certain temperament, that means it can be reached in only a few [[generator]]s, so it is likely to appear frequently in scales of that temperament. For example, in [[meantone]] temperament, the generator represents 3/2, so clearly 3/2 has a very low complexity, since it can be reached in only one generator. In contrast, 45/32 can only be reached in 6 generators so it has a higher complexity and will tend to appear much less frequently in meantone scales. | ||
The | The ''complexity of a chord'' likewise refers to the number of generator steps required to generate all the pitches of the chord. | ||
Note that the concept of complexity applies not only to [[rank-2 | Note that the concept of complexity applies not only to [[rank-2 temperament]]s, but temperaments of any rank. For higher-rank temperaments, the lattice is a higher-dimensional space, so there could be different ways of measuring the area/volume/etc. that a chord takes up. | ||
== Complexity measures == | == Complexity measures == | ||
Some specific, mathematically rigorous definitions of "complexity" | Some specific, mathematically rigorous definitions of "complexity" are… | ||
* [[Graham complexity]] | * [[Graham complexity]] (chord complexity) | ||
* [[Generator complexity]] | * [[Generator complexity]] (temperament complexity) | ||
* [[Tenney- | * [[Tenney-Euclidean temperament_measures #TE complexity|TE complexity]] (temperament complexity) | ||
* [[Tenney-Euclidean_metrics#Temperamental complexity| | * Various [[height]] functions (interval complexity in JI) | ||
* [[Tenney-Euclidean_metrics #Temperamental complexity|Interval temperamental complexity]] (interval complexity in temperaments) | |||
[[Category:Complexity| ]] <!-- main article --> | [[Category:Complexity| ]] <!-- main article --> | ||
[[Category:Theory]] | |||
[[Category:Overview]] | |||