Schismic–countercommatic equivalence continuum: Difference between revisions

Normalize mappings
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 149: Line 149:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~729/640 = 234.528
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~729/640 = 234.528


{{Val list|legend=1| 5, 31c, 36c, 41, 46, 87, 220, 307 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 5, 31c, 36c, 41, 46, 87, 220, 307 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.168264
[[Badness]]: 0.168264
Line 164: Line 164:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~655360/531441 = 351.476
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~655360/531441 = 351.476


{{Val list|legend=1| 41, 58, 99, 239, 338, 915b, 1253bc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 58, 99, 239, 338, 915b, 1253bc }}


[[Badness]]: 0.372848
[[Badness]]: 0.372848
Line 179: Line 179:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.630
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.630


{{Val list|legend=1| 41, 111, 152 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 111, 152 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.636715
[[Badness]]: 0.636715
Line 194: Line 194:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~5/4 = 386.668
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~5/4 = 386.668


{{Val list|legend=1| 41, 123, 164, 205, 369, 574, 779, 2132bc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 123, 164, 205, 369, 574, 779, 2132bc }}


[[Badness]]: 0.934310
[[Badness]]: 0.934310
Line 209: Line 209:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.315
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.315


{{Val list|legend=1| 41, 135c, 176, 217, 475, 1167, 1642, 2117b }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 135c, 176, 217, 475, 1167, 1642, 2117b }}


[[Badness]]: 1.240078
[[Badness]]: 1.240078
Line 224: Line 224:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~{{monzo| 47 -28 -1 }} = 351.114
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~{{monzo| 47 -28 -1 }} = 351.114


{{Val list|legend=1| 41, 147c, 188, 229, 270, 1121, 1391, 1661, 1931, 3592bc, 5523bbc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 147c, 188, 229, 270, 1121, 1391, 1661, 1931, 3592bc, 5523bbc }}


[[Badness]]: 1.528465
[[Badness]]: 1.528465