Schismic–countercommatic equivalence continuum: Difference between revisions
Normalize mappings |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) "optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence |
||
| Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~729/640 = 234.528 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~729/640 = 234.528 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 5, 31c, 36c, 41, 46, 87, 220, 307 }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.168264 | [[Badness]]: 0.168264 | ||
| Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~655360/531441 = 351.476 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~655360/531441 = 351.476 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 58, 99, 239, 338, 915b, 1253bc }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.372848 | [[Badness]]: 0.372848 | ||
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.630 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.630 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 111, 152 }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.636715 | [[Badness]]: 0.636715 | ||
| Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~5/4 = 386.668 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~5/4 = 386.668 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 123, 164, 205, 369, 574, 779, 2132bc }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.934310 | [[Badness]]: 0.934310 | ||
| Line 209: | Line 209: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.315 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.315 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 135c, 176, 217, 475, 1167, 1642, 2117b }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 1.240078 | [[Badness]]: 1.240078 | ||
| Line 224: | Line 224: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~{{monzo| 47 -28 -1 }} = 351.114 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~{{monzo| 47 -28 -1 }} = 351.114 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 147c, 188, 229, 270, 1121, 1391, 1661, 1931, 3592bc, 5523bbc }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 1.528465 | [[Badness]]: 1.528465 | ||