Octave reduction: Difference between revisions
m Replaced xen-calc link by an internal one, fixed typo |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
&= 24\end{align}</math> | &= 24\end{align}</math> | ||
== | == Generalizations == | ||
=== Other equaves === | === Other equaves === | ||
Octave reduction is mainly used in the context of octave-equivalent tunings (eg. [[12edo]]), where equivalent notes are separated by octaves. However, this operation can be generalized to any [[Periodic scale|periodic tuning]] by replacing the octave by the interval of equivalence or ''[[equave]]'' of that tuning. | Octave reduction is mainly used in the context of octave-equivalent tunings (eg. [[12edo]]), where equivalent notes are separated by octaves. However, this operation can be generalized to any [[Periodic scale|periodic tuning]] by replacing the octave by the interval of equivalence or ''[[equave]]'' of that tuning. | ||
For example, '''tritave reduction''' is the analog of octave reduction in a tritave-equivalent tuning (eg. [[ | For example, '''tritave reduction''' is the analog of octave reduction in a tritave-equivalent tuning (eg. [[Bohlen–Pierce]]), where the equave is the [[tritave]]. Therefore, a tritave-reduced interval is always obtained through transposition by tritaves, and the reduced interval lies between the unison (1/1) and the tritave (3/1). | ||
The general formula for an interval <math>r</math> and an equave <math>e</math> is as follows: <math>\text{red}(r, e) = r \cdot e^{-\left\lfloor{\log_e r}\right\rfloor}</math>. Note that <math>e</math> is a variable and not Euler's number. | The general formula for an interval <math>r</math> and an equave <math>e</math> is as follows: <math>\text{red}(r, e) = r \cdot e^{-\left\lfloor{\log_e r}\right\rfloor}</math>. Note that <math>e</math> is a variable and not Euler's number. | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
* Consider a tritave-equivalent tuning; 7/9 is less than 3, so multiply by 3 to get 7/3. | * Consider a tritave-equivalent tuning; 7/9 is less than 3, so multiply by 3 to get 7/3. | ||
* Consider a just perfect fifth-equivalent tuning; <math>\text{red}(81/64, 3/2) = 81/64 \cdot (3/2)^{-\left\lfloor{\log_{3/2} 81/64}\right\rfloor} = 1</math>. | * Consider a just perfect fifth-equivalent tuning; <math>\text{red}(81/64, 3/2) = 81/64 \cdot (3/2)^{-\left\lfloor{\log_{3/2} 81/64}\right\rfloor} = 1</math>. | ||
* In the equal-tempered | * In the equal-tempered Bohlen–Pierce tuning, a tritave can be expressed as 1300 hekts and a BP fifth down as -500 hekts. This interval is less than the unison, so add 1300 hekts to get 800 hekts. | ||
=== Balanced reduction === | === Balanced reduction === | ||