Talk:Subgroup temperament families, relationships, and genes: Difference between revisions
→Confusion about rank of a gene: new section |
Re |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
"The dimension or rank of a gene is simply its rank as a temperament (which is one less than the rank of the subgroup is being tempered from)" | "The dimension or rank of a gene is simply its rank as a temperament (which is one less than the rank of the subgroup is being tempered from)" | ||
I don't understand the part in parentheses here. Why is it one less? —[[User:Keenan Pepper|Keenan Pepper]] ([[User talk:Keenan Pepper|talk]]) 21:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
: Because it tempers out one comma? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
:: Oops, cruft from an earlier revision where I was only looking at codimension-1 genes. Edited [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 03:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
== "Gene" vs step of 311? == | |||
Isn't "gene" already taken as a step of 311edo? P.S. Honestly I'd rather it be removed from 311edo than from here. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 00:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC) | |||
: Yeah I think this is a rare case where the name is appropriate and the concept is novel enough to deserve a name. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 00:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC) | |||
: Oh and by the way this idea is actually in use in my temperament finder right now, though I ended up just calling them families because gene isn't really a widely recognized term (I think?) – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) | |||
:: I don't think these are similar enough types of concepts as to cause conflicts. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 16:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC) | |||