Talk:39edo: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Overthink (talk | contribs)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 53: Line 53:


:: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 20:30, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
:: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 20:30, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
:: So, as I'm editing the table for a 39c column, I've realized 39c isn't significantly better than 39. In light of this, I propose two tables. First for 39d as we had before (plus primes 13 and 19 via 39df), and a second table for a comparison on various other mappings: 39 in 2.25.35.11, 39c, 39, and 39d. This will cater to more demands than ever. Those who don't think of 39 as a dual-prime system get their cleaner table, and those who do get their table too.
:: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
::: Seems like an okay solution, worth a try. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 20:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)


: I have no opinion on 39et in particular, but I will agree that "patentness" is a completely arbitrary quality and the procedure of rounding is merely heuristic to get something that usually works. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 19:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
: I have no opinion on 39et in particular, but I will agree that "patentness" is a completely arbitrary quality and the procedure of rounding is merely heuristic to get something that usually works. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 19:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Return to "39edo" page.