Talk:Garischismic family: Difference between revisions

(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 9:

: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 16:49, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

:: On the garischismic stuff you're right; we could pull a 180 and call [25 -14 0 -1⟩ ''garyma'' or ''garisma'', freeing ourselves of the "schismic" association. Now that you mention it, we could have gary for 2.3.7/2.3.7.11, garic for 7-limit and 11-limit, willy for 2.3.5.13(.19), and some portmanteau for the rank-3 that has all. Wilgar? Possibly something new like ''Erin''? --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 17:18, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

::: I wouldn’t want to rename a temperament based on one person’s opinions alone. We need to hold some sort of community vote or something. Plus, if we’re disassociating non-schismic commas/temperaments from schismic, then what about the [[syntonoschisma]], [[slendroschisma]], and possibly ones I don’t even know about? <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 17:27, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

:::: Let it be held then. I will say however, I don't really care about people changing temps of names if as there's a good reason to change it, like dissociation from a very common temp (like schismic or slendric) or following standard patterns. --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 17:57, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

::: I don't think ''garisma'' fixes it as it's still associated with garibaldi. We have many ''-schismic'' names so I don't think that alone constitutes a problem either. I'm in principle not against renaming ''cassaschismic'' but I'm only willing to consider canonicalizing it w.r.t. one of the temps I mentioned above (including dual-naming). —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:31, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

:::I agree with FloraC here. It’s not much of a problem. <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 19:03, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 : —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 16:49, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
+:: On the garischismic stuff you're right; we could pull a 180 and call [25 -14 0 -1⟩ ''garyma'' or ''garisma'', freeing ourselves of the "schismic" association. Now that you mention it, we could have gary for 2.3.7/2.3.7.11, garic for 7-limit and 11-limit, willy for 2.3.5.13(.19), and some portmanteau for the rank-3 that has all. Wilgar? Possibly something new like ''Erin''? --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 17:18, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
+::: I wouldn’t want to rename a temperament based on one person’s opinions alone. We need to hold some sort of community vote or something. Plus, if we’re disassociating non-schismic commas/temperaments from schismic, then what about the [[syntonoschisma]], [[slendroschisma]], and possibly ones I don’t even know about? <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 17:27, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
+:::: Let it be held then. I will say however, I don't really care about people changing temps of names if as there's a good reason to change it, like dissociation from a very common temp (like schismic or slendric) or following standard patterns. --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 17:57, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
+::: I don't think ''garisma'' fixes it as it's still associated with garibaldi. We have many ''-schismic'' names so I don't think that alone constitutes a problem either. I'm in principle not against renaming ''cassaschismic'' but I'm only willing to consider canonicalizing it w.r.t. one of the temps I mentioned above (including dual-naming). —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:31, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
+:::I agree with FloraC here. It’s not much of a problem. <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 19:03, 30 April 2026 (UTC)