Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy: Difference between revisions

Eufalesio (talk | contribs)
Pontiac
Godtone (talk | contribs)
m Sensipent: i dont intend on documenting 17-limit sensor as being too inaccurate for its complexity
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This page serves to document temperaments people deem to be highly valuable, and organizing them broadly by accuracy preference, and then approximately by subgroup focus, that is, what sort of harmonies, broadly speaking, the temperament is targetting. Under each accuracy and subgroup focus is found an incomplete list of temperaments, organized ''approximately'' by complexity (how many notes per octave are required). The complexity given is the note count per octave (or for no-2's, per tritave), with the set of odds used for deriving the complexity given. Sometimes two complexities are given and the average is taken for the purpose of ranking.
== Introduction ==
This page serves to document temperaments people deem to be highly valuable, and organizing them broadly by accuracy preference, and then approximately by subgroup focus, that is, what sort of harmonies, broadly speaking, the temperament is targetting.  


'''Importantly: ''do not add a temperament if you do not consider it to be unusually/uniquely valuable for making music with''.''' Temperaments here should only be ones that one or more people seriously consider to be "cream of the crop". Therefore, when adding a temperament, ''make sure to include a description of how it works'', ideally one that motivates it as to why someone might want to use it.
Under each accuracy and subgroup focus is found an incomplete list of temperaments, organized ''approximately'' by complexity (how many notes per octave are required). The complexity given is the note count per octave (or for no-2's, per tritave), with the set of odds used for deriving the complexity given. Sometimes two complexities are given and the average is taken for the purpose of ranking.


'''Importantly:''' the "accuracy" classification of a temperament is the ''maximum error allowed'' on (almost*) ''all'' intervals. {{nowrap|* If there}} is some intervals in the corresponding (thr)odd-limit that violate this bound slightly even in an optimized tuning, they should be noted as "'''Bound-violating intervals:'''" under the header for easy comprehension and consideration, but this should not be abused to attempt to reclassify temperaments, as there should only be one to three such intervals at most (the larger the set of target odds, the more are permissible), and ideally zero. The main exception that justifies more than two bound-violating interval pairs is when a single odd is responsible for all of them (e.g. odd 7 in [[#Buzzard]]). Therefore, most temperaments in a category are more accurate than the bound suggests.
== Edit guides ==


The bounds are: '''exotemperament''' (>~18c), '''very low''' (<~18c), '''low''' (<12c), '''medium''' (<7c), '''high''' (<4c), '''microtemperament''' (<1c).
=== Do <big>not</big> add a temperament if you do not deem it unusually/uniquely valuable for making music. ===
Temperaments here should only be ones that one or more people seriously consider to be "cream of the crop". Therefore, when adding a temperament, ''make sure to include a description of how it works'', ideally one that motivates it as to why someone might want to use it.
 
=== The ''accuracy'' classification of a temperament is the maximum error allowed on (almost*) all intervals. ===
<nowiki>*</nowiki>If there are intervals in the corresponding (thr)odd-limit that violate this bound slightly even in an optimized tuning, they should be noted as "'''Bound-violating intervals:'''" under the header for easy comprehension and consideration.
 
This should not be abused to attempt to reclassify temperaments. There should be ideally zero, at most 2 intervals (more in more complex subgroups). The main exception that justifies more than two bound-violating interval pairs is when a single odd is responsible for all of them (e.g. odd 7 in [[#Buzzard]]). Therefore, most temperaments in a category are more accurate than the bound suggests.
 
The bounds are:
 
* [[Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy#Microtemperaments (<1c)|Microtemperament]] (~ <1c)
* [[Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy#High accuracy (<4c)|High accuracy]] (1 ~ 4c)
* [[Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy#Medium accuracy|Medium accuracy]] (4 ~ 7c)
* [[Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy#Low accuracy (<12c)|Low accuracy]] (7 ~ 12c)
* [[Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy#Very low accuracy (12~18c)|Very low accuracy]] (12 ~ 18c)
* [[Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy#Exotemperament|Exotemperament]] (~ >18c)


The two name system is for two reasons: to account for people's varying preferences and terminology for accuracies and to make the system of categories symmetrical, with [[exotemperament]]s and [[microtemperament]]s as the extrema.
The two name system is for two reasons: to account for people's varying preferences and terminology for accuracies and to make the system of categories symmetrical, with [[exotemperament]]s and [[microtemperament]]s as the extrema.


The cent errors are a result of a set of compromises between people of different preference, and being given in cents, are somewhat arbitrary. It should be noted that because the exotemperament bound is very high, it is not meaningful to pretend that the bound is even remotely precise, so that the "<~18c" bound was chosen to allow using [[5edo]] and [[7edo]] as the circle of [[~]][[3/2]]'s to barely qualify as not being exotemperaments, both as such a valuation is potentially contentious and as they may yield interesting simplified logics taking advantage of the damage for error cancellations.
The cent errors are a result of a set of compromises between people of different preference, and being given in cents, are somewhat arbitrary. The exotemperament bound is very high because it is not meaningful to pretend that the bound is even remotely precise. The "<~18c" bound was chosen to allow using [[5edo]] and [[7edo]] as the circle of [[~]][[3/2]]'s to barely qualify as not being exotemperaments, due to both being the extrema of [[5L 2s|diatonic]].


'''Also:''' the convention for this page, in contrast to most xen wiki pages, is that if you want to refer to another rank 2 temperament while discussing a rank 2 temperament, you should link to that rank 2 temperament's entry '''on this page''' (unless you are merely discussing competing extensions/don't intend to log that temperament separately on the page) so that the page can be fairly self-contained to avoid intimidating and confusing someone using this page as a reference. The obvious exception is every temperament here may link to its own entry on other pages. Also note that the purpose of using #Temperament to link to something on this page is to indicate that clicking on the link will not take you away from the page and that #Temperament is intended to be logged on the page.
=== Style guide ===
The convention for this page in contrast to most Xenharmonic Wiki pages, is that if you should link rank 2 temperaments '''on this page,''' unless you are merely discussing competing extensions or don't intend to log that temperament separately. That way, the page can be fairly self-contained to avoid intimidating or confusing someone using this page as a reference.  
 
The obvious exception is the title referring to the main entry. The purpose of using #Temperament here is to indicate that clicking on the link will send you to the section in '''this''' page, if it exists. If not, feel free to add it.


== Generator tunings ==
== Generator tunings ==
Wherever you see "Generator tunings:" on this page, the tunings are given in the format ''a''\''b'', which means ''a'' steps of ''b'' [[edo]], which means the frequency ratio 2<sup>''a''/''b''</sup>.
"Generator tunings" on this page are given in the format '''a\b''', meaning ''a'' steps of ''b'' [[edo]]; the frequency ratio 2<sup>''a''/''b''</sup>.


For example, you can '''input''' 44\111 '''in''' [[Scale Workshop]] '''by hovering over "New scale" on the left, then pressing "Rank-2 temperament", then entering''' (e.g.) 44\111 '''in the "Generator" input field'''.
You can input 44\111 in [[Scale Workshop]] by hovering over "New scale" on the left, then pressing "Rank-2 temperament", then entering 44\111 in the "Generator" input field.


You will then get a list of "MOS sizes" to pick from before pressing "OK" to generate the scale. The importance of this is that picking from this list gives you a [[MOS scale]] which has certain properties that make its usage more regular and predictable than picking some number of notes not in that list, though ''note the list of MOS sizes is sometimes incomplete on Scale Workshop'' (if the list runs out of space), which is why another part of the standard format of temperaments documented here is ''x''L ''y''s MOS sizes, so that you can manually specify (''x'' + ''y'') notes as the number of notes if the MOS sizes list does not go far enough.
You will then get a list of '''MOS sizes''' to pick from before pressing '''OK''' to generate the scale. The importance of this is that picking from this list gives you a [[MOS scale]] which has only up to two sizes of minimum intervals. The UI shows an incomplete list of MOSes, so you can still add your own amount of notes by modifying the '''Scale size'''.


{{ todo | example of an efficient and useful rank 2 temperament with a small generator that the MOS sizes list on Scale Workshop doesn't go far enough for }}
In some cases, the [[octave]] is split or tempered, in which case you will instead see pairs.


In some cases, the [[octave]] is not the period of the scale or is strongly recommended to be tempered, in which case you will instead see pairs; for example, for [[#Godzilla]] (which is strongly recommended to be tempered), it is (4\30<3>, 19\30<3>). This means that 4\30<3> goes in the "Generator" input field and 19\30<3> goes in the "Period" input field. (In the case of godzilla, this reflects tempering the octave sharp so that 3/1 is just in order to get various intervals of 3, 5, 7 and 13 more in tune as they are all tuned flat in [[19edo]]; very significantly so in the case of 7 and 13).
* Taking [[Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy#Diaschismic, srutal archagall|#Diaschismic]] as a split example, it is (3\34, 1\2). This means that 3\34 goes in the "Generator" input field and 1\2 goes in the "Period" input field. You must then change '''Number of periods''', to 2 in this case. This will create a series of [[Multi-MOS]] scales that repeat more than once per octave.  Notice also that "Generators up/down from 1/1" goes up in pairs. This because you are adding a generator per period, and in diaschismic there are two periods, thus two generators. In some pages like [[Sintel]]'s [https://sintel.pythonanywhere.com/ temperament calculator], this is not displayed. For instance, in diaschismic, the calculator says you need -2 fifths to reach ~5, so to use this in In Scale Workshop you multiply this number by the number of periods to get your mapped in interval: input 4 down generators.
 
* Taking [[#Godzilla]] as a tempering example, it is (4\30<3>, 19\30<3>). This means that 4\30<3> goes in the "Generator" input field and 19\30<3> goes in the "Period" input field. This reflects tempering the octave sharp so that 3/1 is just in order to get various intervals of 3, 5, 7 and 13 more in tune as they are all tuned flat in [[19edo]]; very significantly so in the case of 7 and 13.


Note that the generator tunings are listed in order of increasing accuracy, with the least accurate being the leftmost; the least accurate tuning is not required to satisfy the maximum cent error, so that a tone-efficient example is included, though the example should be unambiguously representative of the full scope of its harmony within reason. All tunings after it should thus be increasingly accurate so that it satisfies the tuning bounds indicated by the accuracy classification of the temperament (up to any indicated exceptions for the temperament).
Note that the generator tunings are listed in order of increasing accuracy, with the least accurate being the leftmost; the least accurate tuning is not required to satisfy the maximum cent error, so that a tone-efficient example is included, though the example should be unambiguously representative of the full scope of its harmony within reason. All tunings after it should thus be increasingly accurate so that it satisfies the tuning bounds indicated by the accuracy classification of the temperament (up to any indicated exceptions for the temperament).
Line 69: Line 90:
[[#Generator tunings|Generator tunings]]: (24\41,) 31\53, 69\118, 100\171, 131\224
[[#Generator tunings|Generator tunings]]: (24\41,) 31\53, 69\118, 100\171, 131\224


Schismic is a very accurate and efficient [[5-limit]] temperament which is almost identical to [[Pythagorean tuning]] except that it tempers the perfect fifth very slightly flat so as to find [[8/5]] accurately at ([[9/8]])<sup>4</sup>, that is, as the [[Pythagorean augmented fifth]], or equivalently, finding [[5/4]] as the [[Pythagorean diminished fourth]]. Note that the smallest edo that validates its status as a microtemperament is [[118edo]], as [[53edo]], though a tone-efficient tuning, doesn't temper the fifth flat enough, as it is practically a relabeling of the [[3-limit]]. 41edo arguably qualifies as the coarsest equal temperament to support schismic well enough, but it is way too tempered for a 5-limit tuning, as it also it is [[magic]].
Schismic is an extremely accurate and efficient [[5-limit]] temperament which is almost identical to [[Pythagorean tuning]] except that it tempers the perfect fifth very slightly flat so as to find [[8/5]] accurately at ([[9/8]])<sup>4</sup>, that is, as the [[Pythagorean augmented fifth]], or equivalently, finding [[5/4]] as the [[Pythagorean diminished fourth]]. Note that the smallest edo that validates its status as a microtemperament is [[118edo]], as [[53edo]], though a tone-efficient tuning, doesn't temper the fifth flat enough, as it is practically a relabeling of the [[3-limit]]. 41edo arguably qualifies as the coarsest equal temperament to support schismic well enough, but it is way too tempered for a 5-limit tuning, as it also it is [[magic]].


In schismic, (9/8)<sup>6</sup> overshoots the octave by [[~]][[81/80]] so that the syntonic comma and the [[Pythagorean comma]] are equated.
In schismic, (9/8)<sup>6</sup> overshoots the octave by [[~]][[81/80]] so that the syntonic comma and the [[Pythagorean comma]] are equated.
Line 101: Line 122:


==== [[Gariwizmic]] ====
==== [[Gariwizmic]] ====
[[Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy#Note counts|Note counts]]: TBA
[[Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy#Note counts|Note counts]]:  
 
* 82: see [[#Gary]]
* 176 for {3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 21, 25


Generator tunings: (55\94, 1\2), (79\176, 1\2), (158\270, 1\2)
Generator tunings: (55\94, 1\2), (79\176, 1\2), (158\270, 1\2)


Gariwizmic has a 1/2-octave period representing [[99/70]], two of them being ~2/1 and tempering out [[9801/9800]]. It is generated by a slightly sharp fifth with the 2.3.7.11 mappings of [[gary]], tempering out [[19712/19683]] and [[131072/130977]], which essentially maps the pythagorean comma to 64/63, and two of those to 33/32.  
Gariwizmic has a 1/2-octave period representing [[99/70]], two of them being ~2/1 and tempering out [[9801/9800]]. It is generated by a [[#Gary]] fifth. As its name implies, it also tempers out the [[wizma]].  


The kalisma allows the pythagorean comma to be split into two [[2835/2816|fwiwismas]], and this allows reaching a [[352/351]] ~ [[385/384]] minicomma by 47 fifths plus a semioctave, or alternatively put, a ~[[256/243|limma]] minus 3.5 pythcommas, tempering out [[4096/4095]] and [[1716/1715]]. Primes 5 and 13 are thus reached by a diminished fourth (96/77) + minicomma (39 fifths + 1 period), and a triply augmented fourth (44/27) - minicomma (-27 fifths - 1 period).  
Tempering out the kalisma allows the pythagorean comma to be split into two [[2835/2816|fwiwismas]], and this allows reaching a [[352/351]] ~ [[385/384]] minicomma by 47 fifths plus a semioctave, or alternatively put, a ~[[256/243|limma]] minus 3.5 pythcommas, tempering out [[4096/4095]] and [[1716/1715]]. Primes 5 and 13 are thus reached by a diminished fourth (96/77) + minicomma (39 fifths + 1 period), and a triply augmented fourth (44/27) - minicomma (-27 fifths - 1 period). This structure is practically identical to that of [[cassaschismic]], only that the minicomma is not an independent generator and is instead found in the deep in the diploid chain of fifths.  


It is best represented in 270edo, which is well known for its astoundingly accurate 13-limit, making it one of the best fifth-based rank-2 temperaments. It is very complex mapping-wise despite its great accuracy, but it can be easily thought as cassandra, but with the minicomma as a "generator" for primes 5 and 13 (and 19) which is still reachable within the rank-2 structure (It isn't a true generator; were it independent, the temperament would be [[cassaschismic]]).
It is best represented in 270edo, which is well known for its astoundingly accurate 13-limit, making it one of the best fifth-based rank-2 temperaments. It is very complex mapping-wise despite its great accuracy, but it can be easily thought as cassandra, but with the minicomma as a "generator" for primes 5 and 13 (and 19) which is still reachable within the rank-2 structure. It isn't a true generator; were it independent, the temperament would be [[cassaschismic]].


It naturally extends into the 2.3.5.7.11.13.19 subgroup by adding [[1216/1215]] to the comma list, finding the major third to be [[19/15]] and 19/16 to be the minor third + minicomma, thus also working as [[361/360]]. Interestingly, gariwizmic tempers out the smallest superparticular of the 19- and 23-limit: the [[tredekisma]].
It naturally extends into the 2.3.5.7.11.13.19 subgroup by adding [[1216/1215]] to the comma list, finding the major third to be [[19/15]] and 19/16 to be the minor third + minicomma, thus also working as [[361/360]]. Interestingly, gariwizmic tempers out the smallest superparticular of the 19- and 23-limit: the [[tredekisma]].
Line 115: Line 139:
==== [[Decoid]] ====
==== [[Decoid]] ====
Note counts: TBA
Note counts: TBA
Bound-violating intervals: [[15/13]]


Generator tunings: (103\130, 1\10), (111\140, 1\10), (214\270, 1\10)
Generator tunings: (103\130, 1\10), (111\140, 1\10), (214\270, 1\10)
Line 126: Line 152:
=== No-3's focus ===
=== No-3's focus ===
=== No-5's focus ===
=== No-5's focus ===
== '''High accuracy (<4c)''' ==
 
==== [[Gary]] ====
Note counts:
 
* 41 for {3, 9, 7, 11, 21, 27, 33, 77, 81, 99} ([[12L 29s]])
 
Generator tunings: 24\41, 55\94, 79\135, 498\851
 
Gary is an extremely good 2.3.7.11 temperament generated by a slightly sharp fifth which maps the pythagorean comma to 64/63, and two of those to 33/32, tempering out [[19712/19683]] and [[131072/130977]], making it an [[Olympic clan|olympic]] and [[Symbiotic comma|symbiotic]] temperament. It can be seen as the no-5, no-13 restriction of [[#Cassandra]]. The lack of 5 and 13 makes these two mappings be optimal, reaching errors well below a cent.
 
It also provides an astonighingly accurate approximation to [[19/15]], which then mapped to the major third tempers out 1540/1539 '''and''' 1216/1215, whose subgroup is 2.3.7.11.19/5, which has no independent prime 19 or 5; only the specific compound interval of dividing the two.
 
41edo is the simplest and easiest to use, [[135edo]] provides an essentially perfect tuning with manageable fineness, to which no other tuning is as good until [[851edo]] makes scene.
 
Prime 31 can also be easily included by tempering out [[1024/1023]], essentially equating [[64/63]] with [[63/62]] and [[33/32]] with [[32/31]]. It accrues more error here than the rest of primes, wanting to tune the fifth a tenth of a cent sharper to get everything within subcent values, which makes everything ever so slightly worsely tuned but still within microtemperament range.
 
There are multiple ways of incorporating prime 5 and 13:
 
* [[#Cassandra]] is the simplest, tempering out the [[225/224|marvel]] and [[325/324|marveltwin]] commas. High accuracy.
* [[#Cotoneum]] is a good one, though with high complexity, tempering out the [[quince comma]] and the [[minisma]]. Very high accuracy.
* [[#Gariwizmic]] is one of the best, also with high complexity, tempering out the [[1716/1715|lumma]] and the minisma. Extremely high accuracy.
 
== '''High accuracy (1~4c)''' ==
The bound is the approximate [[JND|melodic JND (Just-Noticeable-Difference)]], though note that this doesn't mean that damage/mistuning is ''imperceptible'' in these temperaments as the harmonic JND can often be significantly smaller, depending largely on context, timbre and who is listening/who you ask.
The bound is the approximate [[JND|melodic JND (Just-Noticeable-Difference)]], though note that this doesn't mean that damage/mistuning is ''imperceptible'' in these temperaments as the harmonic JND can often be significantly smaller, depending largely on context, timbre and who is listening/who you ask.
=== 5-limit focus ===
=== 5-limit focus ===
Line 154: Line 202:
* the most accurate is [[#Sendai]] which finds primes 23 and 29
* the most accurate is [[#Sendai]] which finds primes 23 and 29
* the second most accurate is [[#Sensible]], which finds primes 11, 17 and 23
* the second most accurate is [[#Sensible]], which finds primes 11, 17 and 23
* the simplest but least accurate is [[#Sensor]] (commonly just called "sensi"), which interprets it as a full 17-limit temperament.
* the simplest but least accurate is [[Sensipent family#Sensor|Sensor]] (commonly just called "sensi"), which interprets it as a full 17-limit temperament, for which the best tuning is [[46edo]].


==== [[Würschmidt]] ====
==== [[Würschmidt]] ====
Line 176: Line 224:
[[#Generator tunings|Generator tunings]]: 24\31, 31\53, 55\94
[[#Generator tunings|Generator tunings]]: 24\31, 31\53, 55\94


Garibaldi is aguably the simplest way of effectively bestowing prime 7 upon [[#Schismic|schismic]], at the cost of accuracy as needing a slightly sharper, not flatter fifth, tunes the 5-limit worse so that it is no longer a microtemperament. This is done by interpreting ([[9/8]])<sup>3</sup> as [[~]][[10/7]] by also tempering out [[5120/5103|S8/S9]] so that 10/9 - 9/8 - 8/7 have equidistant steps, with the step being a convenient tempered comma-sized interval that simultaneously represents [[64/63|S8]], [[81/80|S9]], and the [[Pythagorean comma]] (as per schismic). [[41edo]] and [[53edo]] are slightly overtempered and undertempered for it respectively, so that [[94edo]] is pretty close to optimal, though it has an slightly inconsistently flat [[~]][[25/16]] which is unbefitting of schismic. 94 + 53 = [[147edo]] also supports it but with yet more inconsistencies due to the finer gamut.  
Garibaldi is arguably the best way to bestow prime 7 upon [[#Schismic]] effectively, at the cost of some accuracy. It uses a slightly sharper fifth that tunes the 5-limit worse, making it no longer a microtemperament. This is done by interpreting (9/8)<sup>3</sup> as [[~]][[10/7]] by tempering out S8/S9 = [[5120/5103]] so that 8/7 and 10/9 are equidistant from 9/8, corresponding to equating S8 = [[64/63]] and S9 = [[81/80]] respectively. This results in a conveniently general tempered comma-sized interval that also represents the [[Pythagorean comma]], which is equal to (9/8)<sup>6</sup> / (2/1). [[41edo]] and [[53edo]] are slightly overtempered and undertempered for it respectively, so that [[94edo]] is pretty close to optimal, though it has a (barely) inconsistently flat [[~]][[25/16]] which is unbefitting of schismic. 94 + 41 = [[135edo]] and 94 + 53 = [[147edo]] also support it but with yet more inconsistencies due to the finer gamut, so it's worth checking the "Prime harmonics" tables to see if you're okay with the errors.  


Extensions include:
Which of 41edo and 53edo do better in the 7-limit depends on how you measure them and who you ask; therefore, a better way of choosing is based on whether you care more about prime 11 or prime 13:
* For prime 11, [[41edo]] is better, as it finds [[~]][[11/9]] as half of the fifth and as a comma above [[~]][[6/5]] (as in [[cassandra]]) or a comma below [[~]][[5/4]] (as in [[andromeda]]), corresponding to [[tetracot]] in 2.3.5.11 (by tempering out (S9/S11 = [[243/242]],) S10 = [[100/99]] and S10/(S9/S11) = [[2200/2187]] respectively) which splits the halved fifth into two small major seconds of [[~]][[11/10]][[~]][[10/9]] around 175.6 cents. However, there is significant damage to 15/13 and 13/10.
* For primes 5 and 13, [[53edo]] is better, as it finds [[interseptimal interval]]s distinctly from adjacent [[septimal]] intervals so that [[~]][[15/13]] is half of a practically-just [[4/3]] (tempering out [[676/675|S13/S15]]) and is (resultantly) found as a comma above [[~]][[8/7]] or a comma below [[~]][[7/6]], which reflects to (3/2)/(15/13) = [[~]][[13/10]] being made the midpoint of [[~]][[21/16]] and [[~]][[9/7]] respectively. It also makes [[~]][[16/13]] a comma below [[~]][[5/4]] (by tempering out ((5/4)/(16/13))/(81/80) = 325/324). This corresponds to a number of temperaments; the most relevant of which for [[#Schismic]] is the very accurate extension to prime 13 called [[Schismatic family#Tridecaschismic (2.3.5.13)|tridecaschismic]], corresponding to reaching 13/4 through (9/8)<sup>10</sup> (tempering out the [[tridecapyth comma]]) and also corresponding to tempering out [[325/324]] = S25*S26 = S10/S12 as mentioned. However, there is significant damage to 14/11. (Also, 53edo's fifth is flatter so better tuned for schismic/for the 5-limit, as implicitly aforementioned.)


* Cassandra (41 & 53), tempering out 385/384 and 352/351, finds prime 11 at 23 fifths, and prime 13 at 20 fifths. It is the best extension, with support up to the 23-limit as seen in 94edo.
Both support [[cassandra]], a 13-limit extension which finds [[~]][[16/13]] as a comma below [[~]][[5/4]] and equates (3/2)/(16/13) = [[39/32]] with [[11/9]]. (This means that in 41edo, we have a single neutral third at the cost of damage to prime 13, while in 53edo we have two neutral thirds at the cost of damage to prime 11, hence 41 + 53 = [[94edo]] is a lot more characteristic of cassandra's tuning.)
* Andromeda (41f & 53), tempering out 385/384 and 351/350, finds prime 11 at 23 fifths, and prime 13 at -33 fifths.
* Helenus (41ef & 53), tempering out 176/175 and 351/350, finds prime 11 at -30 fifths, and prime 13 at -33 fifths.
 
Which of 41edo and 53edo do better in the 7-limit depends on how you measure them and who you ask; therefore, a better way of choosing is based on whether you care more about primes 7 and 11 or prime 5 and 13:
* For primes 7 and 11, [[41edo]] is better, as it finds [[11/9]][[~]][[27/22]] as [[Sqrt(3/2)|half of the fifth]] and as a comma above [[~]][[6/5]] or a comma below [[~]][[5/4]]; This also corresponds to being the intersection of [[cassandra]] and [[andromeda]] (respectively). Primes 5 and 13 are worse, as these mappings prefer an ever so slightly flat fifth.
* For primes 5 and 13, [[53edo]] is better, as it has a close to just fifth that benefits schismic, tempering out 325/324 too so that [[~]][[16/13]] is a comma below [[~]][[5/4]]. This corresponds to [[Schismatic family#Tridecaschismic (2.3.5.13)|tridecaschismic]]. Primes 7 and 11 are worse, as their cassandra mappings prefer a slightly sharper fifth.


=== 11-limit focus ===
=== 11-limit focus ===
Line 238: Line 282:
=== No-3's focus ===
=== No-3's focus ===
=== No-5's focus ===
=== No-5's focus ===
 
== '''Medium accuracy (4~7c)''' ==
 
 
== '''Medium accuracy (<7c)''' ==
Many temperaments that people consider theoretically tend to fall into this category, due to its balance of simplicity and accuracy and due to the common usage of [[meantone]] temperaments, though plenty of simple temperaments exist that are even more accurate, documented in higher-accuracy categories.
Many temperaments that people consider theoretically tend to fall into this category, due to its balance of simplicity and accuracy and due to the common usage of [[meantone]] temperaments, though plenty of simple temperaments exist that are even more accurate, documented in higher-accuracy categories.
=== 5-limit focus ===
=== 5-limit focus ===
Line 251: Line 292:
Meantone is an incredibly efficient temperament for targetting [[5-odd-limit]] harmony whose characteristic is flattening [[3/2]] (the generator) by a few cents. Perhaps unsurprisingly, it was historically the most commonly used temperament. It does this by sacrificing a distinction between [[9/8]] and [[10/9]] so that two "tones" makes [[5/4]], hence its name.
Meantone is an incredibly efficient temperament for targetting [[5-odd-limit]] harmony whose characteristic is flattening [[3/2]] (the generator) by a few cents. Perhaps unsurprisingly, it was historically the most commonly used temperament. It does this by sacrificing a distinction between [[9/8]] and [[10/9]] so that two "tones" makes [[5/4]], hence its name.


==== [[Srutal archagall]] ====
==== [[Srutal archagall|Diaschismic, Srutal archagall]] ====
[[#Note counts|Note counts]]:
[[#Note counts|Note counts]]:
* 10 for {3, 5, 9, 15, 17} ([[2L 8s]])
* 10 for {3, 5, 9, 15, 17} ([[2L 8s]])
Line 356: Line 397:
=== No-2's focus ===
=== No-2's focus ===


==== [[Bohlen-Pierce-Stearns]] ====
==== [[BPS]] ====
[[Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy#Note counts|Note count]]:
[[Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy#Note counts|Note count]]:
* 7 for {5, 7, 25, 35, 49} ([[4L 5s (3/1-equivalent)|4L 5s<3/1>]])  
* 7 for {5, 7, 25, 35, 49} ([[4L 5s (3/1-equivalent)|4L 5s<3/1>]])  
Line 363: Line 404:
[[#Generator tunings|Generator tuning]]: 10\13edt
[[#Generator tunings|Generator tuning]]: 10\13edt


This is arguably the most important temperament of the nonoctave [[3.5.7 subgroup]]. This temperament has a tritave period, and a generator of [[~]][[9/7]]. The tritave-reduced 7th harmonic, [[7/3]], is found at -1 generators, and the tritave reduced 5th harmonic, [[5/3]], is found at +2 generators, tempering out [[245/243]]. It is as simple as a good temperament in its subgroup can be, covering the entire no-evens 7-throdd-limit tonality diamond in 7 notes, with no redundant or missing notes, and any simpler temperament would have to equate simple consonances and have very low accuracy. Its accuracy is quite good, with a no-evens 7-throdd-limit minimax error of 4.73 cents. An excellent scale to explore this temperament is the 9-note mos, or lambda scale, which can be considered the 3.5.7 analog of the diatonic scale.
BPS is arguably the most important temperament of the nonoctave [[3.5.7 subgroup]]. This temperament has a tritave period, and a generator of [[~]][[9/7]]. The tritave-reduced 7th harmonic, [[7/3]], is found at -1 generators, and the tritave reduced 5th harmonic, [[5/3]], is found at +2 generators, tempering out [[245/243]]. It is as simple as a good temperament in its subgroup can be, covering the entire no-evens 7-throdd-limit tonality diamond in 7 notes, with no redundant or missing notes, and any simpler temperament would have to equate simple consonances and have very low accuracy. Its accuracy is quite good, with a no-evens 7-throdd-limit minimax error of 4.73 cents. An excellent scale to explore this temperament is the 9-note mos, or lambda scale, which can be considered the 3.5.7 analog of the diatonic scale.


=== No-3's focus ===
=== No-3's focus ===
Line 400: Line 441:
The 2.3.7 part of [[#Buzzard]] is not as accurate as everything else in the 13-limit; specifically, its interval of 7 barely violates the 4{{cent}} bound, however it makes up for it by being much simpler (mapping-wise) so that it is interesting as a 2.3.7-subgroup temperament that splits [[3/1]] into four equal parts, each representing a sharp [[~]][[21/16]], which defines it in the 2.3.7 subgroup. [[53edo]], [[58edo]] and [[111edo]] are good tunings.
The 2.3.7 part of [[#Buzzard]] is not as accurate as everything else in the 13-limit; specifically, its interval of 7 barely violates the 4{{cent}} bound, however it makes up for it by being much simpler (mapping-wise) so that it is interesting as a 2.3.7-subgroup temperament that splits [[3/1]] into four equal parts, each representing a sharp [[~]][[21/16]], which defines it in the 2.3.7 subgroup. [[53edo]], [[58edo]] and [[111edo]] are good tunings.


== '''Low accuracy (<12c)''' ==
== '''Low accuracy (7~12c)''' ==
Low accuracy temperaments in small prime limits are commonly considered due to their simplicity. As a result, "higher-limit focus" tends to not be focused on at this accuracy, as the error involved on intervals beyond the [[17-limit]] is potentially too much depending on the context and who you ask, though again such temperaments are commonly relevant as targets for detempering.
Low accuracy temperaments in small prime limits are commonly considered due to their simplicity. As a result, "higher-limit focus" tends to not be focused on at this accuracy, as the error involved on intervals beyond the [[17-limit]] is potentially too much depending on the context and who you ask, though again such temperaments are commonly relevant as targets for detempering.
=== 5-limit focus ===
=== 5-limit focus ===
Line 440: Line 481:
=== No-5's focus ===
=== No-5's focus ===


== '''Very low accuracy (<~18c)''' ==
== '''Very low accuracy (12~18c)''' ==
Very low accuracy temperaments are of interest to people wanting simple scales and who are fine with high damage. As a result, they tend not to have "higher-limit focus", as the error involved on intervals beyond the [[17-limit]] is too much. A variety of people consider this category to largely or even entirely be composed of exotemperaments, while others argue for various entries in this category being reasonable to consider harmonically based on the temperability of the simplest [[LCJI]] intervals.
Very low accuracy temperaments are of interest to people wanting simple scales and who are fine with high damage. As a result, they tend not to have "higher-limit focus", as the error involved on intervals beyond the [[17-limit]] is too much. A variety of people consider this category to largely or even entirely be composed of exotemperaments, while others argue for various entries in this category being reasonable to consider harmonically based on the temperability of the simplest [[LCJI]] intervals.
=== 5-limit focus ===
=== 5-limit focus ===