Talk:70:90:105:126: Difference between revisions

m Tone, I guess
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 117: Line 117:


:::::::: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:28, 3 April 2026 (UTC) (last edited [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:33, 3 April 2026 (UTC))
:::::::: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:28, 3 April 2026 (UTC) (last edited [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:33, 3 April 2026 (UTC))
::::::::: I tested 24:20:16:14:9 vs. 9:7:6:5:4. The latter sounds much better to me. It's hard to have a productive discussion when we can't agree about the relative consonance of various voicings. I made a poll on discord about this. Perhaps that will clarify things.
::::::::: --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 11:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::: I don't think polling helps, and as I said, naming chords isn't solely about which chord "sounds better" (the phrase you used in your poll).
:::::::::: I suppose despite all the compelling reasons I've shown you, you've made up your mind, and we're not going anywhere with this discussion. Given that, we'll have to describe both approaches in these chord pages.
:::::::::: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:01, 6 April 2026 (UTC) (last edited [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC))
Return to "70:90:105:126" page.