User talk:FloraC: Difference between revisions

(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 67:

--[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 23:45, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

: Sure. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:39, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

== About schismina ==

What's the deal with the schisminic temp? It is 2.3.5.7.13, there's no 11. Also, I would deem the differences I outlined are notable, because they show how many ''simple'' ratios of 35 have tiny differences with tridecimal equivalents and viceversa. Specially 8505/8192, whose pressence in Sagittal pretty much assumes that the schismina is either tempered out or fudged. It's that important of a schisma, we have to sell it as such! --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 17:05, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

: > What's the deal with the schisminic temp? It is 2.3.5.7.13, there's no 11.

: That's why ''schismina'' isn't a great name for the comma; there's no room to distinguish the minimal-prime-subgroup temp and the full-prime-limit temp according to our rules. I've proposed something else in ''Talk: 4096/4095''.

: > I would deem the differences I outlined are notable.

: I think there's a problem in how you present your ideas. If all you wanna discuss is the merge of intervals of 13 with intervals of 35, add that instead. A pair of ratios may serve as an example, but the entire point is in the context. The ratios alone which comprise three- or even four-digit ones aren't notable cuz no one uses them in music.

: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 17:33, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

Hello Flora, how are you today? I see you corrected some mistakes I unwittingly made when editing MOS pages, for example, when I called 2L 17s a MOS of Pycnic temperament and you took it out, noting that 2L 17s is actually tritonic temperament. So, I just wanted to say thank you, and I will double-check my edits in the future. [[User:MisterShafXen|MisterShafXen]] ([[User talk:MisterShafXen|talk]]) 17:28, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 23:45, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
+: Sure. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:39, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
+== About schismina ==
+What's the deal with the schisminic temp? It is 2.3.5.7.13, there's no 11. Also, I would deem the differences I outlined are notable, because they show how many ''simple'' ratios of 35 have tiny differences with tridecimal equivalents and viceversa. Specially 8505/8192, whose pressence in Sagittal pretty much assumes that the schismina is either tempered out or fudged. It's that important of a schisma, we have to sell it as such! --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 17:05, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
+: > What's the deal with the schisminic temp? It is 2.3.5.7.13, there's no 11.
+: That's why ''schismina'' isn't a great name for the comma; there's no room to distinguish the minimal-prime-subgroup temp and the full-prime-limit temp according to our rules. I've proposed something else in ''Talk: 4096/4095''.
+: > I would deem the differences I outlined are notable.
+: I think there's a problem in how you present your ideas. If all you wanna discuss is the merge of intervals of 13 with intervals of 35, add that instead. A pair of ratios may serve as an example, but the entire point is in the context. The ratios alone which comprise three- or even four-digit ones aren't notable cuz no one uses them in music.
+: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 17:33, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
+== Thanks ==
+Hello Flora, how are you today? I see you corrected some mistakes I unwittingly made when editing MOS pages, for example, when I called 2L 17s a MOS of Pycnic temperament and you took it out, noting that 2L 17s is actually tritonic temperament. So, I just wanted to say thank you, and I will double-check my edits in the future. [[User:MisterShafXen|MisterShafXen]] ([[User talk:MisterShafXen|talk]]) 17:28, 6 May 2026 (UTC)