Talk:Tetracot family: Difference between revisions
Created page with "== 17- and 19-limit extensions == Most of the 17-limit extensions look quite bad. I wonder if it's better to skip prime 17 and go straight for 19 instead. ~~~~" |
→17- and 19-limit extensions: reply |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== 17- and 19-limit extensions == | == 17- and 19-limit extensions == | ||
Most of the 17-limit extensions look quite bad. I wonder if it's better to skip prime 17 and go straight for 19 instead. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 16:30, 24 November 2025 (UTC) | Most of the 17-limit extensions look quite bad. I wonder if it's better to skip prime 17 and go straight for 19 instead. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 16:30, 24 November 2025 (UTC) | ||
I agree with FloraC. [[User:MisterShafXen|MisterShafXen]] ([[User talk:MisterShafXen|talk]]) 20:35, 27 May 2026 (UTC) | |||
: Since tetracot exaggerates the difference between 9/8 and 10/9, it doesn't make sense to equate 19/17 with either of them (except for maybe 9/8 in 48edo). The 7edo tuning should also map 19/17 to 1\7 for it to deserve canonicity, though it's impossible to do this accurately without splitting 81/80 in two. Since there is a fairly obvious canonical 19/7 at +3 generators, most of these shouldn't be extended to 17. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 20:33, 19 June 2026 (UTC) | |||