101ed7: Difference between revisions
→Theory: some rework |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Theory == | == Theory == | ||
101ed7 is closely related to [[36edo]] (sixth-tone tuning), but with the 7th harmonic rather than the [[2/1|octave]] being just. The octave is stretched by about 0.770 [[cent]]s. Like 36edo, 101ed7 is [[consistent]] to the [[integer limit|8-integer-limit]]. | 101ed7 is closely related to [[36edo]] (sixth-tone tuning), but with the 7th harmonic rather than the [[2/1|octave]] being just. The octave is stretched by about 0.770 [[cent]]s (almost identical to [[93ed6]], where the octave is stretched by about 0.757 cents). Like 36edo, 101ed7 is [[consistent]] to the [[integer limit|8-integer-limit]]. | ||
Compared to 36edo, 101ed7 is pretty well optimized for the 2.3.7.13.17 [[subgroup]], with slightly better [[3/1|3]], [[7/1|7]], [[13/1|13]] and [[17/1|17]], and a slightly worse 2 versus 36edo. Using the [[patent val]], the [[5/1|5]] is also less accurate. Overall this means 36edo is still better in the [[5-limit]], but 101ed7 is better in the [[13-limit|13-]] and [[17-limit]], especially when treating it as a dual-5 dual-11 tuning. | Compared to 36edo, 101ed7 is pretty well optimized for the 2.3.7.13.17 [[subgroup]], with slightly better [[3/1|3]], [[7/1|7]], [[13/1|13]] and [[17/1|17]], and a slightly worse 2 versus 36edo. Using the [[patent val]], the [[5/1|5]] is also less accurate. Overall this means 36edo is still better in the [[5-limit]], but 101ed7 is better in the [[13-limit|13-]] and [[17-limit]], especially when treating it as a dual-5 dual-11 tuning. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* [[57edt]] – relative edt | * [[57edt]] – relative edt | ||
* [[93ed6]] – relative ed6 | * [[93ed6]] – relative ed6 | ||
* [[129ed12]] – relative ed12 | * [[129ed12]] – relative ed12, close to the zeta-optimized tuning for 36edo | ||
[[Category:36edo]] | [[Category:36edo]] | ||