User:Dummy index/Chromatic pairs and how we define haplotonic: Difference between revisions
Dummy index (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dummy index (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Proposal to simplify the definition = | = Proposal to simplify the definition = | ||
* In order to distinguish between the fixed category of [[:Category:Haplotonic scales]], etc., and the reciprocal relationship (haplotonic) + (albitonic) = (chromatic), the latter will be called, for example, triplet. Every 3 successive generations of MOS that satisfies the above relationship will be called a triplet. | * In order to distinguish between the fixed category of [[:Category:Haplotonic scales]], etc., and the reciprocal relationship (haplotonic) + (albitonic) = (chromatic), the latter will be called, for example, MOS triplet. Every 3 successive generations of MOS that satisfies the above relationship will be called a MOS triplet. | ||
** Or moshaplotonic as a parent MOS, moschromatic as a descendant MOS, like that [[moschroma]] and [[mosdiesis]] are relative from any MOS scale of interest. | |||
* If the number of notes in the scale is important, consider using the [[Pentatonic]] and [[Heptatonic]] pages. | * If the number of notes in the scale is important, consider using the [[Pentatonic]] and [[Heptatonic]] pages. | ||
* Based on the above equation and the nature of MOS, the chromatic must be a direct descendant of the albitonic. So I don't like the existence of mega-albitonic between albitonic and chromatic, even though the meanings of relational and categorical usages don't have to be exactly the same. (I will also withdraw the mini-albitonic that I said.) | * Based on the above equation and the nature of MOS, the chromatic must be a direct descendant of the albitonic. So I don't like the existence of mega-albitonic between albitonic and chromatic, even though the meanings of relational and categorical usages don't have to be exactly the same. (I will also withdraw the mini-albitonic that I said.) | ||
* Categorical haplotonic scales include the last MOS that s ≥ 125 ¢ and some subset of such scales. in <nowiki>[[Chromatic pairs]]</nowiki>, such subsets all may be labelled mini-haplotonic (even if there are more than one). | * Categorical haplotonic scales include the last MOS that s ≥ 125 ¢ and some subset of such scales. in <nowiki>[[Chromatic pairs]]</nowiki>, such subsets all may be labelled mini-haplotonic (even if there are more than one). | ||
* Categorical albitonic scale is the first MOS that s < 125 ¢. | * Categorical albitonic scale is the first MOS that s < 125 ¢. | ||
* Categorical chromatic | ** If the interval that appears is too narrow to be a semitone, it may be a [[Cluster MOS]]. | ||
* Categorical chromatic scales include direct descendant of albitonic (by adding corresponding haplotonic) and further descendant <del>(by adding same haplotonic)</del>. in <nowiki>[[Chromatic pairs]]</nowiki>, such further descendants all may be labelled mega-chromatic (even if there are more than one). | |||
= Memos = | = Memos = | ||