Template talk:Cent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) →What was the purpose of this change?: new section |
m Re |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I don't understand if anything was wrong about how it was before, or what advantage the new way has. As far as I know, ISO does not spell out how thin of a space should occur between quantities and units, only that the space should be thinner than a standard space. And cents aren't ISO anyway. But I prefer how this template worked previously, with the Narrow No-Break Space. I think the Hair Space (with no-break/no-wrap applied otherwise) is too thin. It's only about 1/10th the size of a standard space, while the narrow is more like 2/3rds. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 04:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC) | I don't understand if anything was wrong about how it was before, or what advantage the new way has. As far as I know, ISO does not spell out how thin of a space should occur between quantities and units, only that the space should be thinner than a standard space. And cents aren't ISO anyway. But I prefer how this template worked previously, with the Narrow No-Break Space. I think the Hair Space (with no-break/no-wrap applied otherwise) is too thin. It's only about 1/10th the size of a standard space, while the narrow is more like 2/3rds. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 04:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
: Reverted. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:39, 4 November 2024
What was the purpose of this change?
Change: https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Template%3ACent&type=revision&diff=161791&oldid=152628
I don't understand if anything was wrong about how it was before, or what advantage the new way has. As far as I know, ISO does not spell out how thin of a space should occur between quantities and units, only that the space should be thinner than a standard space. And cents aren't ISO anyway. But I prefer how this template worked previously, with the Narrow No-Break Space. I think the Hair Space (with no-break/no-wrap applied otherwise) is too thin. It's only about 1/10th the size of a standard space, while the narrow is more like 2/3rds. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 04:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)