20th-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[20edo]] is not a particularly harmonically interesting edo, but some of its multiples have high consistency limits (17-odd-limit and higher), and therefore are worthy of being considered in terms of rank-2 temperaments. | {{Infobox fractional-octave|20}} | ||
[[20edo]] (in isolation) is not a particularly harmonically interesting edo, but some of its multiples have high consistency limits (17-odd-limit and higher), and therefore are worthy of being considered in terms of rank-2 temperaments. It's worth noting that [[Degrees]] (discussed elsewhere) is a no-31's [[41-limit]] temperament which serves as a well-temperament of [[80edo]] in the corresponding subgroup, as a 60L 20s MOS is sufficient for finding all its primes. | |||
In the 17-limit, one step of 20edo is extremely close to 88/85, which serves as a period in two of these temperaments – Soviet Ferris wheel and calcium. | In the 17-limit, one step of 20edo is extremely close to 88/85, which serves as a period in two of these temperaments – Soviet Ferris wheel and calcium. | ||
| Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~208568572998046875/144115188075855872 = 633.970 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~208568572998046875/144115188075855872 = 633.970 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|40, 140, 180, 320, 460, 600, 740, 780, 1060, 1240, 1520}}, ... | |||
=== 7-limit === | === 7-limit === | ||
| Line 69: | Line 70: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~238/165 = 633.913 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~238/165 = 633.913 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|140, 320, 460}} | |||
===19-limit=== | ===19-limit=== | ||
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19 | Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19 | ||
| Line 81: | Line 82: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~238/165 = 633.913 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~238/165 = 633.913 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|140, 320, 460}} | |||
==Calcium== | ==Calcium== | ||
| Line 100: | Line 101: | ||
=== 19-limit === | === 19-limit === | ||
Both [[11/7]] and [[19/16]] are reached in eight generator steps. | 2000edo and 2460edo are adjacent members of a sequence of tunings with progressively less error in 19-limit. Both [[11/7]] and [[19/16]] are reached in eight generator steps. | ||
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19 | Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19 | ||
| Line 112: | Line 113: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~169/153 = 172.196 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~169/153 = 172.196 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|460, 2000, 2460}} | |||
===23-limit=== | ===23-limit=== | ||
| Line 125: | Line 126: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~11875/10752 = 172.196 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~11875/10752 = 172.196 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|460, 2000, 2460}} | |||
{{Navbox fractional-octave}} | |||
[[Category:20edo]] | [[Category:20edo]] | ||