Arithmetic tuning: Difference between revisions

Clarify the term; heading levels and other styles
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
See also: remove link to AID because Shaahin's pages are below the level of pedagogical clarity and conceptual coherency that this page should link to; and the link to the arithmetic mean is outdated because I have since realized the inherent link between means and progressions
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
An '''arithmetic tuning''' is one which has equal step sizes ''of any kind of quantity'', whether that be pitch, frequency, or length (of the resonating entity producing the sound). This ''arithmetic'' does not refer to measurements in the arithmetic scale, as in [[arithmetic mean]], but any arithmetic-like scale.  
An '''arithmetic tuning''' is one which has equal step sizes ''of any kind of quantity'', whether that be pitch, frequency, or length (of the resonating entity producing the sound).
 
This sense of the word arithmetic comes from the mathematical concept of an [[Wikipedia:Arithmetic sequence|arithmetic sequence]], which means a sequence with a constant difference between successive terms.  


All arithmetic tunings are [[harmonotonic tunings]].
All arithmetic tunings are [[harmonotonic tunings]].
Line 6: Line 8:


Equal frequency steps:
Equal frequency steps:
* [[OD|OD, otonal division]]
* [[OD|OD, otonal division]] (such as an [[ODO]])
* [[EFD|EFD, equal frequency division]]
* [[EFD|EFD, equal frequency division]]
* [[OS|OS, otonal sequence]]
* [[OS|OS, otonal sequence]]
Line 13: Line 15:
Equal pitch steps:
Equal pitch steps:
* [[EPD|EPD, or ED, equal (pitch) division]] (such as an [[EDO]])
* [[EPD|EPD, or ED, equal (pitch) division]] (such as an [[EDO]])
* [[AS|AS, ambitonal sequence]]
* [[APS|APS, arithmetic pitch sequence]]
* [[APS|APS, arithmetic pitch sequence]]
* [[AS|AS, ambitonal sequence]]


Equal length steps:
Equal length steps:
* [[UD|UD, utonal division]]
* [[UD|UD, utonal division]] (such as a [[UDO]])
* [[ELD|ELD, equal length division]]
* [[ELD|ELD, equal length division]]
* [[US|US, utonal sequence]]
* [[ALS|ALS, arithmetic length sequence]]
* [[ALS|ALS, arithmetic length sequence]]
* [[US|US, utonal sequence]]


== Basic examples ==
== Basic examples ==
Line 33: Line 35:
Other arithmetic tunings can be found by changing the step size. For example, if you vary the overtone series to have a step size of 3/4 instead of 1, then you get the tuning <math>1, 1\frac 34, 2\frac 24, 3\frac14</math><span>, which is equivalent to <math>\frac 44, \frac 74, \frac{10}{4}, \frac{13}{4}</math>, or in other words, a class iii [[isoharmonic chords|isoharmonic]] tuning with starting position of 4. We call this the otonal sequence of 3 over 4, or OS3/4.  
Other arithmetic tunings can be found by changing the step size. For example, if you vary the overtone series to have a step size of 3/4 instead of 1, then you get the tuning <math>1, 1\frac 34, 2\frac 24, 3\frac14</math><span>, which is equivalent to <math>\frac 44, \frac 74, \frac{10}{4}, \frac{13}{4}</math>, or in other words, a class iii [[isoharmonic chords|isoharmonic]] tuning with starting position of 4. We call this the otonal sequence of 3 over 4, or OS3/4.  


If the new step size is irrational, the tuning is no longer JI, so we use a different acronym to distinguish it: AFS, for arithmetic frequency sequence. For example, if we wanted to move by steps of φ, like this: <math>1, 1+φ, 1+2φ, 1+3φ...</math> etc. we could have the AFSφ.  
If the new step size is irrational, the tuning is no longer JI, so we fall back to a more general acronym to distinguish it: AFS, for arithmetic frequency sequence. For example, if we wanted to move by steps of φ, like this: <math>1, 1+φ, 1+2φ, 1+3φ...</math> etc. we could have the AFSφ. Because different acronyms are used to distinguish rational (JI) tunings from general tunings which include irrational (non-JI) tunings, while the acronyms used for general tunings technically include the JI tunings, these general acronyms are more useful when reserved for non-JI tunings, and this is what is typically done. So when "irrational" is used on this page, it more accurately means "probably irrational".


OS and AFS are equivalent to taking an overtone series and adding (or subtracting) a constant amount of frequency. By doing this, the step sizes remain equal in frequency, but their relationship in pitch changes. For a detailed explanation of this, see the later section on the [[OS#Derivation|derivation of OS]].
OS and AFS are equivalent to taking an overtone series and adding (or subtracting) a constant amount of frequency. By doing this, the step sizes remain equal in frequency, but their relationship in pitch changes. For a detailed explanation of this, see the later section on the [[OS#Derivation|derivation of OS]].