Talk:Vals and tuning space: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:12, 29 June 2021 view source Cmloegcmluin (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,160 edits →Meaning of last sentence ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:21, 30 June 2021 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 18,391 edits →Meaning of last sentence: re Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	"Note that the TE norm for this val is approximately 31." I don't understand what this sentence is trying to tell me about this fact. Is it a coincidence? What is the significance? Is this unexpected, or unusual? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 22:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)		"Note that the TE norm for this val is approximately 31." I don't understand what this sentence is trying to tell me about this fact. Is it a coincidence? What is the significance? Is this unexpected, or unusual? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 22:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

			: Any "good" (meaning: it tries to approximate the JI) val is expected to have the TE norm [complexity] close to its division of the octave. It is the complexity of the temperament and can be used to compute the TE relative error. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)