Talk:Minkowski block: Difference between revisions

Mike Battaglia (talk | contribs)
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
m Xenwolf moved page Talk:Minkowski blocks to Talk:Minkowski block: singular rule for better linking
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
{{WSArchiveLink}}
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
 
<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
 
----
 
== What does this sentence mean? ==
"We can find a subgroup of just intonation in which every member of the notes of the temperament, for a particular just tuning, has a unique representative."
 
Clearly you're not saying that any tempered interval have a unique JI representative, since we're dealing with epimorphisms, so what do you mean by this? I'm trying to figure out if these are related to the rank-3 triple wakalixes which can temper down to MOS in three different ways:
 
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning-math/files/Keenan%20Pepper/tmp.svg
 
- '''mbattaglia1''' September 24, 2011, 02:25:32 AM UTC-0700
----
Suppose we take the meantone tuning where fifths are pure. Then every note of meantone is given a unique JI representative in Pythagorean tuning.
 
- '''genewardsmith''' September 24, 2011, 04:26:42 PM UTC-0700
----
Return to "Minkowski block" page.