Talk:Table of 159edo Intervals: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Formatting: my POV |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::: It's good to see that I've gotten a few things right in how I'm doing this chart. It is precisely to convey the structural characteristics of the temperament that I have set certain criteria for the inclusion of intervals in the chart, refusing to use intervals with too great of a margin of error both in absolute and relative terms. (reposted by --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)) | ::: It's good to see that I've gotten a few things right in how I'm doing this chart. It is precisely to convey the structural characteristics of the temperament that I have set certain criteria for the inclusion of intervals in the chart, refusing to use intervals with too great of a margin of error both in absolute and relative terms. (reposted by --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)) | ||
I've changed my mind. The table looks clean now because it's not completely filled. But if you do an exhaustive search as I did in [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Table_of_198edo_intervals&oldid=52608 Table of 198edo intervals], you'll see how messy it is and how a lot of them are unuseful. That's why I decided to remove them and now [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Table_of_198edo_intervals&oldid=53819 this version] looks much better to me. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:19, 30 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
: Well, in that case my comments in ''[[Talk:Table of 198edo intervals#The " meaning]]'' will also apply here. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC) | |||